
Mind you he wasn't 18 in the novel but 20 years. And him being 18 or 20 means he has come of age. He clearly did not make any sexual attempts at the MC, if you even bothered reading you'd see he had sexual relationship s with women. The MC was the one that initiated the relationship. Throwing around the word "Pedo" when you don't even know the meaning

I don't care how old he was in the novel first of all he's 18 freshly 18 in this story mind u 17-18 year olds are still in highschool literally still kids
"the mc initiated the relationship" are u fucking dumb it doesnt matter who initiated what relationship as a grown ass adult he shouldnt have had sex with him bc he "initiated" it bro shouldve done anything but that.. u can try and. convince me all u want but hes a pedo and ur trying to justify it bc ur a fucking creep. read it if u want i really dont care

You're still green. You probably just started reading Yaoi lmao. You are an Illiterate who clearly don't know what pedophilia is and you have no right to call me a creep. You are the one that can't separate reality from fiction, you didn't even read the story and you are yapping a butt load of shit. I wonder what you'll do if you read ILWAT who's an actual pedophile but still have one of the largest fandom in the community. Gtfo, if you don't know shit about what you're reading

I wouldn't term this as 'pedo' cause he's legally 18 and has consent. Pedo are those ones who's sexually attracted to pre-adolescent children (which is not so in this case). It's not illegal and People disapprove of it because of the age gap that might lead to unhealthy relationships(like power and domination). One can say the age gap is unfavorable but definitely, this is not a pedophilia. We have to make sure we use the current term (⌒▽⌒)

The character is 18 — which means he's legally an adult in most places. You can argue he's still young emotionally or mentally, and that's fine. But calling someone a 'pedo' for being with a legal adult isn't just inaccurate, it's dangerous. Pedophilia is a clinical term for attraction to prepubescent children, usually under 13. Misusing is un educative and it also disrespects real victims of child abuse by muddying the definition.

That 'used' is being misused. There might be another term but not pedophilia. People shouldn't use this term whenever and whatever they want. There's another term for this but definitely not pedo. This is not a debate, just wanted to correct it and you should be open to correction as well. If we want to understand it in a mature way, all we can do is understand the context and consent. Like, people should search up and start using terms specifically, without assumptions. Search up ephebophilia
this is trash and hes a pedo