Responses
It's called a power difference I believe. It's basically like your boss saying let me fuck you or you get fired, and you don't get to say no. Definitely fits the legal definition of SA. Plus what JK does in front of someone completely without Dan's consent or knowledge is 100% SA
Accidentally downvoted
THANK YOU for having common sense. Dan was coerced, aka he never gave real consent!!!
the comments are frying me up. i’m not even half way through the story, but i understand everyone’s opinion on this. though, i can’t say the things jjk did wasn’t SA. yes, dan consented on it—though was it really a consent when he literally had no choice but to accept, due to the fact that dan really needed the money? SA can be classified by many things. dan was lit forced to accept the things jjk did. he didn’t want it, but does he have a choice? dan is literally not fully free to say no—due to the fact that he’s doing it for survival, not because he wants to. but because he really needs to.
to those that keeps on justifying that what jjk is doing isn’t SA, pls know in mind that SA has a lot of classifications.