Responses

"A chicken and a cow are fair game but a dog is where you draw the line?" SO TRUE IT'S GIVING HYPOCRISY Like the author of this manhwa clearly said FURRY for a reason; gawking animals.
If you want the safe-soft-half-animal then go read those cat boy cat girl comics, they're not tagged as Furry bcs they don't even act like one, just a pair of cat ears and a tail for the aesthetic.
You cannot cry exploitation now when you were complicit by YOUR STANDARDS less two chapters ago. It's giving selective outrage at buzzword topics AND performative morals.
You don’t have to like the short, you don’t even have to engage with the story anymore (free will is a gorgeous, gorgeous thing) But if you only speak up when the packaging makes you feel implicated, not when the exploitation is obvious and routine, then maybe take a moment to ask yourself why you tolerated the rest of the story without a peep.
Yes, BL has a very real problem with pedophilia, grooming-coded tropes, and authors with disturbing side art that inevitably gets exposed. I get the vigilance, I support the vigilance. But vigilance requires discernment and I'm sorry but a lot of y'all don't have it.
t's the same with those of you who are bashing the idea of the author including Fluffy in sex scenes. A chicken and a cow are fair game but a dog is where you draw the line? Fine if it makes you uncomfortable, but to project your personal discomfort and make it everyone else's moral failing simply won't stand.