PREACH! Someone called me a pedo for calling them out on their bullshit, like, what? Do these people even know what "pedophilia" even means?
LOUDER FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE BACK
"A chicken and a cow are fair game but a dog is where you draw the line?" SO TRUE IT'S GIVING HYPOCRISY Like the author of this manhwa clearly said FURRY for a reason; gawking animals.
If you want the safe-soft-half-animal then go read those cat boy cat girl comics, they're not tagged as Furry bcs they don't even act like one, just a pair of cat ears and a tail for the aesthetic.
EXACTLY. im so glad there are still people with some sense on this godforsaken pirate site <3
Dw ma'am I still have common sense, just NOT the money
To be fair fluffy started out as a dog while the other two were ORIGINALLY human and still act/ want to be treated as such. Fluffy can’t even talk…so yea ppl are gonna find possible explicit scenes with a character that is so far from being a person weird
I thought fluffy turned with everyone else? Do you have where they confirm him to be a dog originally?
go Lia go, spit out more facts(≧▽≦)
This wasn't the take you thought it was. Fluffly was a dog and the others were humans.
Even if that's the case, the point about Fluffy wasn't the main topic covered in my original comment. Conjecture about a characters origins doesn't invalidate everything I said before that.
Idk if its me being autistic but can you clarify what you said before that I didnt really get it i think its about M2?
It’s still not confirmed whether Fluffy is Older A’s former dog or not. He just has far more prominent animalistic dog traits like overprotectiveness and the smell and his overall behaviour.
Yes he was on the farm since the beginning according to the other employees, BUT even they assume he’s a human-dog hybrid much alike to the rest of them.
Just because he’s sniffing and holding the old picture doesn’t mean he WAS an actual dog or at least it’s not confirmed as of yet.
Also I think it’s important to note that Older A calls him a puppy in Fluffy’s flashbacks in ch. 3 if I remember correctly, but as the NPC guy explained to Little A “Folks started turning into animals” NOT the other way around.
This work is literally labeled as human experiments, body modification and drug use in chapter 1. NO mention of animal experimentation.
OPs comment is valid either way.
You cannot cry exploitation now when you were complicit by YOUR STANDARDS less two chapters ago. It's giving selective outrage at buzzword topics AND performative morals.
You don’t have to like the short, you don’t even have to engage with the story anymore (free will is a gorgeous, gorgeous thing) But if you only speak up when the packaging makes you feel implicated, not when the exploitation is obvious and routine, then maybe take a moment to ask yourself why you tolerated the rest of the story without a peep.
Yes, BL has a very real problem with pedophilia, grooming-coded tropes, and authors with disturbing side art that inevitably gets exposed. I get the vigilance, I support the vigilance. But vigilance requires discernment and I'm sorry but a lot of y'all don't have it.
t's the same with those of you who are bashing the idea of the author including Fluffy in sex scenes. A chicken and a cow are fair game but a dog is where you draw the line? Fine if it makes you uncomfortable, but to project your personal discomfort and make it everyone else's moral failing simply won't stand.