
TJ is really a piece ot shit thats for sure, but the way you are saying he "guide' Ian into sex doesnt seem right. You even add Ian needs to take a stand against TJ.
Ian is the one who keeps making the choice over and over again to be with TJ. And he is making that choice based on his feelings and no other influence as far as i know. So what Ian needs to do is make a choice : go back to TJ and be miserable OR move on.
In this chapter, Ian actually seemed pretty into it sexually. Atleast for the first half (up.until the penetration started). My guess is he loves both ML but slowly leaning more towards Jo.
Also, saying "ian keeps going bacl to TJ" is probably meant as him keep going back on his situationship with TJ, not him physically going back to TJ.

You misinterpreted what I meant by guide, my fault since it does seem worded weirdly. I didn't imply guide Ian INTO sex. I said guide Ian as in guide him into a PLACE to have sex because that what tj wants to do, but its not like we havent seen tj actually guide (coerced) ian before. The rest of your comment (minus the last paragraph) is a longer version of what I said/directed. I don't see the need to tell me.
Last part could be so but ig you haven't seen many of the comments saying Ian went back to tj directly. Still doesn't change the fact most of the time Ian doesn't go back but actually follows after being found by tj several times. Ian only went back once (from what we seen) and that was at the funeral which tj lost the opportunity after Ian finally (basically) gave an answer.

Thank you♡ I do appreciate when others like what I comment. It's very hard when the majority of readers, all sides, don't understand the context. I even get upset with Jo stans because every once in a while they act like tj stans when Ian enters his turmoil and self destructive state. This story is not meant for everyone esp if they refuse to accept Ian relationships with both tops.
"Ian keeps going back to tj"
Ian: walk in an alley minding his business
tj: finds Ian and drags him to the toilet and guides what he selfishly wants to do.
The only problem is Ian needs to take a stand against tj actions. That the only criticism as of now and how you say the oppsite of what actually happens dilutes the storytelling.
1. Ian did not go back to tj, he was found by tj. 2. Ian did not say his life is miserable without tj, he said tj leaving after the funeral (after Ian gave him a answer) made him feel miserable.
3. Ian did not imply pleasure in their sex, he implied it's only a familiar feeling, how their sex is always conditioned. That's it.
I feel like this fandom is just a bunch of surface level readers that ruin the story. Tj is rightfully hated. Jo is not. Half the shit tj has told Ian yall would burn Jo at the stake if he had said it. Cut the hypocrisy already and take off the rose tinted glasses when discussing what is actually happening between their words and actions.