He might if he has ovaries and produces egg cells, but I’m not sure if the fetus will survive
He can, bc if we take it like a real case, it will be like the person who have the most similar dna fuck you, so it will practically be incest, therefore the child can exist but the percetage for it to born alive is almost cero bc of the dna.
So, the answer is yes, can the baby be born? No, itll have miscarriage
It will definitely not
Right, I wasn’t sure if the fetus would have the same dna as the father, if it did can it survive?
No, every human has a different DNA for a reason, the fetus cannot live if it has the same DNA as the father, it will be clonation, something that in humans with our technology is impossible. In this manwha the impregnation will also be imposible bc of the same reason, I said it was possible in a real case only because of the slightest difference of dna, but no, it is not (I reread what I said and I totally miss the point lol).
We are light years far from cloning, we were only able to do so on animals, but even in them, the offspring didnt live too much time
Not definitely this is biology not certain mathematics where 1+1=2 there's even a chance a healthy baby my be born even through the high chance of multiple congenital diseases through the excessive homozygosity that's occuring.
Nope, have you ever heard about a succesfull project of clonation? Even if theres a fetus, it wont live because of the same DNA, youre right, it is not math but biology, we are humans, not cells who can have mitosis, humans cannot generate an offspring with 100% accurate DNA.
This case is not incest(bc in incest the fetus can live with difficulties or not), because is the same DNA, this is clonation.
What about identical (monozygotic) twins?
Even they dont share the exact same DNA, they still have differences that only on laboraty can be seen, in conclusion, not even they have the same DNA.
As I said, clonation (the exact same DNA with another being) is impossible, maybe it can be possible in the future but currently it is not (on humans)
Interesting, would love to read other people’s opinions too (=・ω・=)
"Nope, have you ever heard about a succesfull project of clonation?"
A quick Google search would have spared me the time of saying YES and this entire statement.Heck Dolly the sheep is quite literally in most Biology text books when the topic of reproduction and cloning is brought up.Along with multiple other examples of Dog,Cats and Sheep.Unless you are specifically talking about Humans and in which case it's not that it can't happen but Ethics exist for a reason
"it is not math but biology, we are humans, not cells who can have mitosis, humans cannot generate an offspring with 100% accurate DNA"
I don't get this statement.Humans carry out mitosis every day...every second.We are a by-product of the conglomeration of cells.
"This case is not incest(bc in incest the fetus can live with difficulties or not), because is the same DNA, this is clonation."
You are infact aware that incest is only an issue because the genes are almost 1 to 1?This case would be an extreme form of incest but it's inherently unique.
Stand alone X + Y = impossible
But here he has complete male and female genitalia hence;
Full egg (X + 22 autosomes) + full sperm (Y + 22 autosomes)= theoretically possible, but extremely high risk of genetic disorders and a miscarriage but not impossible.
You will know in the next few chaps :P
You already said it, I thought i said enough times that clonation can only happen on animals, but not in humans (in my other reply I talked about it). And by ethics, scientists do not care too much about that, but for their experiments, like the scientists who were able to eliminate the extra cromosome of the down syndrome, they confront legal issues because of that but, at the end of the day, we were able to know about this experiment. Of course clonation is a totally different topic, but for sure, it hasnt happen not because of ethics, it is because of technology.
As you said humans carry out mitosis every day, youre correct, but we are not a cell, we cannot split appart like one, we have a completely different type of reproducción and process for it to happen, we are made out of them, but we are not them, we dont share the same characteristics as them.
And btw youre completely ignoring the facts that the female and male genital are from the same person.
Just to make it more crear, an egg have 23 cromosomes, with information of just one parent, and the sperm have the other 23, in this case, we have the same information from both sides, in will be for example like having two left feets, therefore not having complete the 46 cromosomes from 2 distinct parents the offspring will only have 23 cromosomes of the same parent, so it cannot happen, cz we humans need 46 cromosomes (or 47).
In conclusion, is needed two parents for the genetical information be completed, if there is only a half of information of the dna, the impregnation cannot happen.
Again, it is different for the animals
God, I have a lots of grammatical mistakes, I hope I made myself clear, srry for the delay
biology nerds, can he hypothetically impregnate himself if he ejaculates into his own vagina?