Responses

no no, look up the definition of furry. it's not furry. this is more like zoophilia/bestiality in a sense (but not really). you can't really call it that because as i have said earlier "the top has a consciousness of a human" and also not furry/scaly because the top isn't anthro or "animal with human characteristics, such as walking on two legs, wearing clothes, or speaking a human language" except the last part, yes. it's not furry nor zoophilia or bestiality does it make sense? sorry english isn't my native language. (this'll be so embarrassing what if i misread your reply )
SIDE 19, DOES THAT COUNT AS A FURRY