
that is true crime. true crime is interesting, but it gets to a point. i could rant for days about how true crime youtubers suck.
however, there is NO way you can compare an actual rapist MURDERER to a fictional rapist. is patrick bateman and the golden state killer comparable in your eyes? im sick and tired of people condoning rape because "they arent real". so what? what kind of picture does it paint to young people that disregarding "no's" and "stop's" is okay?
be so fr rn.

"Young people"?? Bruh, people reading this are fking aware about what is good/bad, things should/shouldn't do, this shít addresses a specific audience. We adult enough to love jjk and hate Epstein, thank you for your concern. For the young audience you're talking about, their parents should control things they consume on the internet. Also shouldn't I be the one saying "however, there is NO way you can compare an actual rapist MURDERER to a fictional rapist" I think you didn't you understand my sarcastic message earlier? If I'm mistaken on something, pls tell me and stay polite.

"adult enough" you are below the age of 18, obviously. and this shit doesnt address a specific audience, bc the rape is CONDONED in this manhwa. isnt that obvious? they treat the rape like its nothing, and kim dan never, ever gets justice. this isnt a psychological manhwa, dumbass.
and how can YOU be the one saying "however, there is NO way you can compare an actual rapist MURDERER to a fictional rapist"?? youre the one who LIKES A RAPIST?????????????? jaekyung is a rapist?????? "We adult enough to love jjk and hate Epstein" no, you are not. once you fully develop your frontal lobe youll realize that this shit is absolutely disgusting? istg youre one of the people who ask "what was she wearing?".
in no way, shape or form, should you love a rapist; FICTIONAL OR NOT!! AND THIS ISNT EVEN A PSYCHOLOGICAL MANHWA!!

Also I said to stay polite you fking btch, so let me call you that.
You’re foaming at the mouth about “condoning rape” in a story while missing the point: people are allowed to consume problematic fiction without becoming problematic people. Horror fans don’t condone murder. Readers of Lolita don’t condone pedophilia. People who like Joker don’t condone terrorism. See how that works?
Jk is written to be toxic, messy, and morally corrupt. That’s the appeal. Fiction is a safe space to explore dark, uncomfortable themes without hurting anyone. If you can’t handle that, just say you don’t like it and move on, no one’s forcing u to read fkhead.
So no, I don’t need to “grow my frontal lobe” to understand the difference between fantasy and reality. Maybe you need to grow yours enough to realize outrage ≠ moral superiority

LMAOOO you really got me good with that one!!! yeah, you can read dark fictional content, did i ever say you couldnt? but it gets to a point when you say you LOVE a rapist???? yes, i enjoy reading passion and shit like that, but that doesnt mean ill sit over here and defend ilay riegrows actions? fuck him.
theres a line between reading it for the thrill, and actually enjoying the character in a perversive way. "we adult enough to love jjk" LOVE??????

when did i ever, ever, ever call someone a pedo?? have you ever heard of a joke?? "Reading this sht on illegal website and leaving think pieces like the author will be seeing it" when did i ever believe the author was going to see it???
"because I called you all out on your performative moral police act" 1. how is this performative, please explain; and 2. when did u ever call me out???? youre the one over here condoning rape in fiction??? dawg???
Y'all wouldn't have survived the killing stalking if it was released today