
She's not saying it out of the blue. He said he likes it there, so she said he could stay.
Yes, it doesnt erase years of trauma, but does that mean she should never apologise or never try to connect with her son?
"Oh yeah you like it here, cool." And then he leaves and she lets him go. I dont think thats isnt a good action either.
Its good that she, today, is trying. She apologised and offered a way to make it up to him
" you like it here? Stress free? I can do that for you. Im sorry i wasnt there for you, i can be here for you now "
Is the best thing she couldve ever done NOW because she cant change the past. Would you rather she go back to the past? Or that she doesnt apologise because 'it doesnt erase the scars'?
I understand that its difficult to forgive her or even make ammends due to her actions, thats valid. But in my opinion, this is the best course of action she couldve taken NOW. He doesnt have to accept it and he doesnt have to do anything, she isnt forcing him.
I mean even if the reason for his parents divorce was fucked up and his mother suffered a shit ton, basically abandoning your son and 10 plus years later you meet up and propose "yeah let's live together " doesn't seem right. Idk the psychological scars left on the ml can't just be erased that easily now can they?