Content warning is for all readers though? And people have different treshold and triggers, so i actually really respect them for putting the warnings.
FR it is for those who may have some issues with seeing blood/violent scenes.
...
why tf are they reading this exact manhwa then?..
girl be fr real?
I'm all for warnings and all. But, you didn't even see how he died. Like yeah, there was a sword in him, but there was no blood. And gore? Because of the ghost slipping out and being all drippie? I'm so confused.
Tf you on about there was literally blood dripping down the sword that was impaled into the dude, thats how he dies because he was human.
Again, i don't think it's something to be complaining about? Most people who are not sensitive about such triggers skip the content warning anyway. And i'd rather publications be extra cautious than not. And also, again, the warning is for everyone, and you can't speak for every single reader.
Where do i complain? I was just confused because i was ready for gore, which didnt happen in the end.
And i mean she is right. When you can't bear even the slightest of blood, why are you still reading this?
But k, when you want to make a big thing about this, hf.
For legal reasons, they need the warnings. Thats it, theres no reasons to be confused about it.
I don't get scared by content warnings nowadays, they're so unserious now
(〜￣△￣)〜
Some rando dies and they still slapped content warning on, at this point it feels like a baiting