You're certainly right about one thing, there's no reason you should be using AI. Especially not in the comment section of some random ass illegal reading site.
I'm not going to rise to the whole 'intelligent people" bit. Your responses sound AI generated. That's NOT a compliment lolll. It's clockable bc it's stiff and overly formal.... And it gets flagged by quite literally every AI detector to exist.
You need to sit this one out. After everything I said condemning child marriage, all you managed to grasp was an accusation that I’m using bots? That’s a comprehension issue on your end. There are still people who can write clearly and intelligently without AI assistance. Before talking nonsense, learn how to construct a proper sentence. Anyways, I’m willing to show you my Uni credentials and thesis. Drop your other social handles and let’s talk. And bitch, I’m the bot and I contribute to ChatGBT through various projects. Come see me and I will educate you on how to compose a proper sentence and grammar.
I have the right to defend my credentials because I work hard to achieve it and I won’t allow a donkey like you to underestimate me. The only thing we can all recognize about you here is that you are lowlife scum with nothing to your name and credibility.
Calm down, we were literally making a ding dang joke.
We're not ACTUALLY saying you two went to ChatGPT to make your comments lol. Obviously.. It was a joke, think of it as a compliment though. Just means you have good English. Kind of like me. I write.✍
I am calm. But put yourself in my position, after working hard to earn our achievements and having someone dismiss it as if it’s meaningless is frustrating. Yes, we’re reading contents for free on this site but that doesn’t mean we’re all bums with no lives or accomplishments. Take care
Calm while calling me out my name? Yeah you'd have to explain that one to me buddy.
If an AI constructed comment is supposed to be proof of your so called "accomplishments".... Loll idk man the jokes write themselves. The fact that you're so heated means I clearly struck a nerve. I wonder why?
Bye you need to take three breaths and maybe a xan on top of that. Again, clearly I struck a nerve bc no way you're moving this big and bad over an accusation that supposedly isn't true?
Proper sentence this, proper sentence that... Is this model UN or is this mangago?
"Drop your other social handles and let's talk"
I'm really crying lmao. Some random ass sap trying to press me like some half assed "academic" version of Suge Knight Oh how fragile your ego must be.
Mind you... I never said you wrote clearly or intelligently to begin with
All you’ve managed to do here is embarrass yourself. The only thing you strucked was that one percent brain of your. You didn’t counter a single point, just threw out baseless accusations and ran when proof was offered. This exchange is a waste of time. Blocked.
No one cares about your useless opinions. Run like the lil bitch you are.
I like this author and some of their other works but pertaining to this story, I’m among the many readers find this story troubling because, while it may not explicitly depict pedophilia, it relies on tropes that closely resemble grooming dynamics. The relationship is built on extreme power imbalance through political coercion, dependence, and protection framing. Innocence and naivety are presented as romantic traits alongside an older, more powerful partner, which normalizes exploitative dynamics rather than mutual adult desire. This reflects a broader BL industry pattern where infantilization and dominance are used in place of healthy, equal relationships, making the discomfort readers feel both understandable and justified.
- Some people argue there’s no grooming involved, but there absolutely is. The author simply flipped the dynamic and made the child appear to be the one initiating it, using reverse psychology to make the story seem less problematic to the audience. This framing functions as a common defence used to excuse pedophile shifting blame by claiming the child “came on” to the adult. In reality, placing an adult and a child in the same bed and deliberately building romantic or sexual tension between them is itself a clear form of grooming, regardless of how it’s portrayed.
-Now on the topic of child bride
Offering a boy as a child bride is not okay because it involves the exploitation and abuse of a child who cannot legally or emotionally give informed consent. Children are still developing physically, mentally, and psychologically, and placing them in a marital or sexual role exposes them to harm, trauma, and power imbalances that strip away their autonomy. Child marriage regardless of gender often leads to disrupted education, long term mental health issues, increased risk of violence, and lifelong inequality. Framing it as tradition, romance, or consent does not change the reality that it prioritizes adult desires over a child’s rights, safety and well being.
-The comment section is basically saying, “It’s fine to offer a child to an older man in marriage, and it’s fine to push the trope that a child can seduce an adult.” You can downvote me all you want, but all that does is expose how morally bankrupt you are.