Finally, Alek!

I'm actually more inclined to Alek than Ivan. Always have been.

Alek has just become a little bit more of a shithead than even he was in the beginning.

honestly the same people saying alek is trash now will be switching teams if it's revealed his backstory is sad or some shit fickle yoai readers

I won't. I have only ever changed my opinion that a trash character is not trash twice in my life. And only one of those times was with BL. Moritat to be precise. I thought the semeish character was trash. But then when the backstory was revealed I realized he had never been trash. The other one was Eggnoid. That had to do with the character Laras.

You literally don't know ANYTHING about him.
The only two things that you know about him are:
1.-He doesn't want commitments at the moment (Neither do Ivan. And why would that be something "trashy"?)
2.-He likes sex (as Ivan, too).
3.-He still ask for consent. (His relationship with hen was allways consensual, He actually wait for him to make a desition. And then there's Ivan who practically rapes hen every time forcefully taking adventage of his mark)

¿So? What else do you know about him?

We kinda have some hints about his personality, but nothing is stated yet.
Even so, He was caring enough to treat Hen well when He was feeling sick.
Of course He can be blunt and "cold" but we don't kow him at all yet.

As in every manga that's uploaded here.
I really hate that, people are so...

Um seriously, learn to read ffs.

I said I preferred Alek to Ivan, mmkay, sweetcheeks?

And I SAID I thought Alek was ONLY being a LITTLE bit more of a shithead than EVEN (meaning I've ALWAYS seen him as the LEAST shitty person around. Maybe you're mad I don't think he IS the shittiest person around and you're trying to annoy me enough so that I'll snap and say he is just to be contrary. Let me tell you, something... it's WORKING sweetie) he was throughout the story.

I NEVER said Alek was trash, either. I was responding to ANOTHER poster about trashy characters I.N. G.E.N.E.R.A.L. Since I never specified that that sentiment INCLUDED Alek your conclusion that it did was hasty and VERY uninformed.

It seems you also have trouble reading the STORY, itself.

He laughed at Hyun when he fell over at the dinner party they had. Sorry if you love it (just kidding, sweetums. I'm merely misinterpreting your words like you did mine, it's just that in my case I'm doing it deliberately because I actually read what you wrote, so I CAN'T misinterpret you accidentally) when other people laugh at you. But I've had bad experiences with being laughed at my whole LIFE. So I KNOW being laughed at is actually NO laughing matter.

He has also jerked Hyun around by showing interest in him for quite awhile before explaining he has no interest in romantic relationships. He also made Hyun feel like a piece of shit clinging to the bottom of his shoe when Hyun presented the documents to him even THOUGH he already KNOWS what the problem is. And that the problem ISN'T Hyun's fault.

And that makes him a little bit of a shithead, as I SAID. Not trash, as they are TWO VERY DIFFERENT THINGS. Mmkaythxbainow.

1.-This misinterpretation was because you didn't express yourself properly.
2.-You are still saying he is a "shithead" just by overstimating meaningless actions
3.-You still assume things even when we don't know anything and then assume too that you are reading the story properly and others don't?

Miss.. doesn't matter how much you extend your posts, you are still wrong.
It's ok if you don't dislike someone or some character, but you CAN'T assume he is something before know his reasons.

1. As we are all readers here assuming something regarding the story and/or the characters based on the given situations and/or actions are normal and not at all uncommon.
2. While I agree with you that we currently know very little about the characters I can't exactly say that Sachiko was wrong, however i cannot say that the statement was right either
3. Seeing as this is only the begining we all still lack deep understanding about the story and the characters and we are all free to interpret the story and the characters as we like.
4. If someone were to say something about a certain character we can only think that that is how that specific character appears to that person and instead of saying that the interpretation of that person is wrong we can just peacefully say what our own thought about that character is. Saying that the person "CAN'T" assume anything is deriving them the right to express their own thoughts.



P. S. This is only an opinion. It is not meant to offened nor attack anyone. Please understand that my statements mean no harm.