I actually disagree. I can't picture the bj being a bottom even if he was a power/passive bottom. Alex whole character is represented as abusive and dominant and his relationship with DG is unhealthy mostly because of his control over DG. I can't imagine a bottom with a smaller physique than the top can hold that power over DG. (No hate just expressing my opinion )
no it's cool (=・ω・=)
You know that a bottom doesn't necessarily have to be smaller and more fragile than a top, right?
of course I know that. What I meant the bottom role doesn't suit the alex character
It's just a sex preference, character has nothing to do with that.
I think that the original idea of the top and bottom could be cool. it could be very interesting to read, a kinda another version of it. (=・ω・=)