No, you didn't. You started responding to @nickname and started insulting me.
Was I talking to you, sweetie? No. And I’ve already said all my arguments to you that obviously won’t get through your thick bigoted skull
Are you really going to use "i wasn't talking to you" in this context? You were talking about me...
Thought I saw somewhere when you replied to someone with a “UM ACTUALLY I studied law SO.” That’s my bad.
I’ve already explained why this relationship wouldn’t be good. Your personal experience with this makes a lot of sense as to why you’re defending him so much. Did you stay in that relationship with that 19 yr old? Did it go well? But that’s none of my business.
And I think you’re misunderstanding something. I’m aware of this cultural difference, and that’s why I said it hard to argue about morals, I’m saying, WHETHER OR NOT people in Korea think it’s ok for an adult to be dating a minor, or just because the sex is supposedly consensual, doesn’t necessarily mean that they would be a healthy couple, especially THIS SPECIFIC COUPLE which I talked about. I know what your argument is and I very cleary address that in my reply.
But I’m not going to continue to argue like this, I’m not going to start a 100+ reply thread with you. It’s just a webtoon. You’re inclined to believe what you want.
You're the one who said you were up for a debate, and considering you "understood my argument", you sure did a good job of making it sound like i'm arguing something else entirely... You can say you addressed my argument, but you really didn't. Disagreeing without stating reasoning isn't "addressing". You literally just said "well that doesn't mean that". I didn't really want to get into this for the umpteenth time tbh, it's just, when you misrepresent my argument THAT bad i want to clarify. Anyways, bye?
Also never said that quote, idk what you're even talking about.
Alright, youraedthiswrogn is now trying to spread misleading information.
I can't reply to because they blocked me. If anybody's interested here's a link
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-age-of-consent-in-Korea-in-a-position-of-trust
The second most important part:
Consequently, even though the ACT ON THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN AND JUVENILES FROM SEXUAL ABUSE clearly states that it is considered rape when a person who is older than a juvenile engages in a sexual intercourse with the juvenile,[63] many Westerners are misinformed about this law because of ambiguous translations. Again, the ACT ON THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN AND JUVENILES FROM SEXUAL ABUSE clearly states that a person who is under 19 and will not turn 19 in the year in which the act is committed is considered a juvenile. (Korean age reckoning is never used in South Korean laws therefore the age of consent in South Korea is 20 in Korean age.)
The MOST important part:
In South Korea, judges have right to interpret the law and this is how the majority of judges interpret the ACT ON THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN AND JUVENILES FROM SEXUAL ABUSE.
So could someone like blondie end up in jail for having sex with someone like the MC? The answer is probably yes, unless they're judged by someone who doesn't agree with the majority.