Yes, I think the author missed a bit in that part. he was brutally raped by a gang, usually whoever goes through it feels terror of sex, in which case he confessed and the same night they had sex ... A bit strange
He mean that he didnt have a normal Relationship with the man he had sex with before
Either a. The author's writing plot as she goes and didn't think of making his past so traumatic until now or
b. He doesn't count gangrape as going all the way with a guy because consent wasn't involved.
I think a but yeah I agree with this theory
I'd go with a (no offence to the author, but the pacing and plot have been all over the place)
Ok, I'm a little confused. The uke said he never went "all the way" with a guy, but then he said he was gang-raped.
I'm a little confused by this flow. Did he say he never had penetrative sex with a guy because he doesn't count the gang rape? Or did he not go "all the way" with the perpetrators. Either way, it seems weird to me that the author would casually drop a bomb like that when the uke didn't seem all that traumatized during or before having sex.