marriage is one thing but that can still be broken off since this is fictional, if by any chance she will end up with one of her suitors (tbh im okay with anyone but the prince) then i might consider reading this again. Though just living with her father and the doting knights as well as the maids that love her would be better than anything, men are shit anyways. (with the exception of men who loves her like their own daughter, pure and untarnished with romance that may result to shitty conflicts later on)
what ?? rape has nothing to do with the mood, is about consent, if agree or not to have a sexual relationship with someone... never talk about serious matter without knowing the meaning of those stuff!!
serieusly think and Inform yourself before you write this in the comments
so are you saying Non-consensual sex is not as serious as rape???? Maybe using the word "rape" was a little too much, it's more of a non-con rlly, but since i wrote that while still fuming i didn't thought of what term i should've used and just ranted about it, unfortunately it went out of hand so I apologize. Still, non-consensual sex is a bad thing and it can also be considered as forced intercourse one way or another, I know it's serious that's why I'm mad about it because the author used it as a trope. Rape or Non-con, both are still wrong so I don't regret writing that comment. Now, If you think Non-consensual sex is not as serious as rape then you're the one who should inform yourself, the victims of non-con may even blame themselves after the "deed" because they "loved" that person, they were manipulated by their own feelings and i think it's serious enough to be cancelled. BOTH ARE SERIOUS KAREN, if you think the male lead's past actions were acceptable just because it isn't considered rape but just a non-con, then you've got everything wrong and you should rethink your past choices sometimes. I've accepted my mistake, please have a moment and think of yours too.
i've also edited the og comment to avoid further misunderstanding
i only read the first line of your comment and i already know that you don't my comment!! WTF WHEN DID I SAY " Non-consensual sex is not as serious as rape???? "...
look write this " she was clearly not in the mood so it's still considered non-consensual"
been consensual has nothing to do with been in the MOOD
i've read your comment that's why i was able to conclude that you don't think non-con sex is as serious as rape, you said it again yourself that you dont recognize "not being in the mood" as a non-consensual sex, lmao suit yourself I guess but wherever you look at it it's still an unwanted sex therefore a non-consensual sex, she even said she don't want it and the guy continued to kiss her neck so what are you spouting on about???do you even know how to analyze things? tbh it doesn't even need analyzation, it's just there. I've wasted too much time on explaining a thing that's so easy to understand, if you're fine with a partner who would force you to strip and have sex with him even if you're not in the mood then okay, just because you're okay with it doesn't mean others will be okay with it too, some have been gaslighted and even become traumatised. I've concluded that "coerced sex without the mood" is okay with YOU because of how lightly you've been talking about this thing. I suggest you to pick a real book or even read articles and documents regarding the victims of it and realize how the thing you're belittling as "JUST not being in the mood" can be as dangerous as rape and is considered non-consensual. read this carefully, I've had a hard time reading yours considering the amount of errors in grammatical and typographical terms. I'm not confident about my grammar too but at least if you're about to plan a debate make sure your stand doesn't look like it's written by a 12 yo girl who doesn't know anything about the world.
again only a line and you still don't understande that i never say that i think that "non-con sex is as serious as rape" when did i say that rape isn't serious i say
if you agree you're consensual
if don't agree you aren't consesual, that is rape
You're not making any sense tbh, the farthest this conversation goes the more your stand changes. What you just said now is almost exactly what i said in my original comment, if you understood my comment enough then maybe you wouldn't even be starting this whole argument lmao. It's useless to talk to someone who doesn't even know what they know, try to learn proper punctuation first kid, then take it to the next level and improve your reading comprehension more, maybe someday you'll understand this world more.
MY STAND NEVER CHANGE YOU ONLY DON'T UNDERSTANDE WHAT I WAS SAYING ALL THIS TIME AND I WON't DO IT AGAIN BECAUSE EXPLAINED WHAT I MEAN IS SIMPLY POINTLESS...
It was confirmed that Tia will still be marrying the prince at the end, and after telling her traumatic past life through a letter, this fvcking immature brat of a prince just acted like an arrogant spoiled brat without even minding the MC's PTSD. It was already too much when he forced her to strip at the beginning to have sex with her in an authoritative way(even tho she loved him, she was clearly not in the mood so it's still considered non-consensual and WRONG on so many levels). He was also a cold-blooded murderer who didn't cared about his unborn child's life, even tho all of these are done by his past self you still cannot ignore the fact that he's still the same person that did it, he just got younger, still arrogant and spoiled nevertheless. I don't even think he has something like remorse, I've never hated a Male Lead this much. This story is trash, the author just romanticizes and treats abusive relationships, psychopathic tendencies and traumatic experiences like it's a fckin personality trait or a cute fiction trope. art style was great but that's it.