WHAT

You didn't though. Stomping only got mentioned after i got involved...

indeed, plus it's not even like the prince was the one to reject the flowers

In my original post I said they got ruined, never only fallen or anything just ruined

"included stomping" - no you didn't -"i included that they got ruined"

it ain't the same thing

What does ruined imply....

i dont get her she's reincarnated and the way she thinks is so..... ha#－.－)...i just dont get reincarnated peoples (〜￣△￣)〜(￣∇￣") ╮(￣▽￣)╭

That it's damaged but this is in no way the same thing. Especially, cuz my point isn't about the main post. Right now we are talking about a distinction and you are going off point.

What?

I ain't arguing about the initial post. The issue is that when you specified/went into details you said that it was because they fell. Not because they were damaged but because they fell to the floor. Now you are stepping back and acting like you said something else. Idk, re-read this whole thing?

Yes but I never said it was only them falling

"but still the flowers had fallen to the ground so it's understandable why they were not delivered to the emperor and in the next page", it doesn't matter if you didn't say that it was the only reason, what you said presented it and implied for that to be the only reason.

I have been thinking this for so time but let's just give up because this is clearly not going anywhere.

" the reason they were not given to the emperor is because they got ruined" in my og message

Like I said before this is not about the og message. It's about what you said when you expanded on it. Consider this conversation over, any replied from here on will only be ignored.

So ur that hard headed huh ok then