Spinels don't however I can see relations between south- asian people and their culture with the spinels such as the names of 'dev' and 'rhea', appearance, accessories and it doesn't help that south-asia was colonised either. Your comment sounds very ignorant regarding the whole artistic freedom given the fact that this is work is very influenced and copied from reality. Slavery still exists and is in many different forms however just a reminder that there is intergenerational trauma from countries such as india from being colonised and people don't seem to understand that it actually exists.
Of course it would. Other ethnic minorities were kept as slaves which were non-black. You know there are other continents aside from America.
So you're saying that artists aren't allowed to portray slavery at all? Just because slavery existed (and still exists) in real life? I see no harm in this story, just because it includes something that's fundamentally negative.
It's not very different from action movies for example. They portray murder and violence, often against innocent people, but the viewers are still allowed to enjoy it. That doesn't make someone a bad person.
im okay with people liking this but the fact that y'all have a whole tag sexualizing slavery.. you DO know that it was only 200 years ago that REAL slavery was abolished in the u.s and only 60 years since black people were given actual rights..