Umm

Right, but they seem to have a weird lack of critical thinking skills.
I understand being scared, I understand flaws, but at the end of the day, they seem to have mentally regressed into eleven year olds who are simply articulate.

Living under abuse makes someone paranoid and can actually pur them into preparing for things without someone else prompting them. But for some reason they haven't actually made a move to do anything like escape with a good amount of provisions to last them a month and so on and so forth.

I am all for a flawed character, but when the author is so obviously trying to reconcile the dad and childeren, it becomes upsetting to me.

It's been a month or so at most and the most that the dad has done is just give them money, and make them more comfortable than their mother.

It's not a high bar.

EXACTLY BRO- these children have gone through shit and they wanna have them act like nothings wrong?????

We're not asking that, we are literally complaining that they aren't as upset about the state of things as they should be.
Th shouldn't have trusted their birth-father so quickly, they shouldn't have been so meek and unknowledgeable about the world and so on.
They should have been angrier, sadder, more tired and exhausted and older than they seem.
They were abused. That can put you through things and make you much more mature in certain aspects like judging people and you can have habits like planning out an escape rout even if there's no danger and mood swings and random bursts of pent up anger and sadness or long days where you can't feel anything, but the point is that the author seems lazy.

I've only seen a few ppl who see the story you do. They want someone to rely on, many people want someone other than their sibling to reply on. They figured since he brought them back he felt a certian way toward them. Yes, they should've been more skeptical about their father. If yall wanna hate on the author for that idc, take it up with them. The most comments I've see were making it seem like they are to blame and they need to take things into their own hands. I do think the author should've been more careful with their actions, but wasnt this originally a novel? If that's the case then they should be upset with the writer, not the artist.

Wh- why??

I do agree that the kids could have been written better and realistically it doesn't make sense for them to be as passive in the events as they are, but I chalked that up to the author projecting their feelings onto the characters or the classic age regression in most reincarnated characters.

I wasn't happy with the fact that the plot and character interactions were surface level, but I didn't care too much since most isekais and stories that have abuse have only assumptions and no actual understanding of abuse.

I do think that most of them were angry that the children who were probably around fifteen or so mentally, didn't do more and they just sat there being thrown around when they could have done better.
And I agree, they could have done better. Much better, but I felt like the reason for not doing so was the author trying to reconcile the father and children and the entire family.

That seems to be the entire plot, the father being forgiven fully by the kids and that's why I'm uncomfortable the the idea and the plot and the entire premise of the story.