the problem with you is that you take everything literally that was not my definition of smut that was a figure of speech so im going to explain it again in a straightforward way that even a simpleton like you would be able to understand lmao what i meant about that statement about sign and my assistant not being "REAL SMUT" is that i think that it is not the PEAK EXAMPLE OF SMUT it was basically ME telling YOU that smut encompassed a wider spectrum not the other way around i was telling you that sign and my assistant should not be used as a. Asis BUT i think that this manga is the perfect embodiment or culmination of the smut genre
*should be used as a point of departure of the smut genre BUT instead i think that this manga is the perfect embodiment or culmination of the smut genre
Omg ur doing it again trying to steal what I said and make it ur own. Go back and read our conversation hun bc what u said was not a “figure of speech”
Never did u ever say that or imply it's obvious to me that ur just lying out ur ass at this point. Reread our conversation babe
How are u telling me over and over that smut is drop-dead dirty kinky sex me taking u literally. Hun u kept saying and when I was trying to say I've read smut that wasn't this intense was saying I was wrong and that I haven't read real smut then. So how was that u telling me it was a wider spectrum and this is just the pinnacle. U just makes no sense at this point. Ur trying to win this argument but u went from being proven wrong by me to stealing what I said and to ultimately agreeing with me make this whole conversation pointless. Give it up boo u were wrong.
*u are
imagine thinking this is worse than all the rapey and problematic manga you've read oof there's nothing more enjoyable than two grown men doing the kinkiest shit with consent