the logic the author applies here (or rather makes the mc apply) smells. he gave consent? bitch, where? when he decided not to put the guy out of commission physically??? he said it wasn’t even rape because he LET HIM but it doesn’t change the fact that the beast assaulted him with the intention to “mount the human” without prior verbal consent being given...
the logic the author applies here (or rather makes the mc apply) smells. he gave consent? bitch, where? when he decided not to put the guy out of commission physically??? he said it wasn’t even rape because he LET HIM but it doesn’t change the fact that the beast assaulted him with the intention to “mount the human” without prior verbal consent being given...