pretty sure that they are, i heard somewhere on tiktok that the author makes lewd drawings of hooni on his twitter. hooni is only 17
I know about it I saw it on rule 34 but it's okay since hooni is 18 in Korea and most on lewd draws I saw of him by searching is him on a cartoon version. What i'm asking is : his he trying to make them look kids or not?
well you can sort of tell by the way he draws sana, hooni, and soorim in certain panels. its weird bc his artstyle is very "chibi-ish" like and hooni does not look 17/18 at all. and obviously that isnt enough proof, but yes, he is a shotacon. theres proof on his twitter, i believe he also drew lewd art of deku from mha who is 15 sooo.
To me hooni looks 18 minimum
I guess i'm going to jail then thanks tho
In Korea the age of consent is 16 so that why the author Leeds them a lot. I don’t think he really is shotacon because his art style doesn’t necessarily mean he like childish stuff. There is a difference with liking cute things and and liking children. And we can’t really say anything about Deku because I think Deku is 16 now and like I said the age of consent in Korea is 16 AND the age of consent in japan is 13. I might be wrong but that’s how I see it. But I completely agree with you that sexualizing minors isn’t right because I’m a minor myself as well and it’s not right to sexualize someone without their consent.
Park Gee is a shotacon. He’s gay, he draws himself as a shota and draws porn of himself and self-inserts (Sana being the most obvious self-insert) into his stories. Afaik he was also sexually abused by adults when he was a minor.
What are you talking about, he have a girlfriend
mmm my bad, he’s bi then ig
Park Gee (the author) isn't a shota right???
Please someone tells me he isn't