It’s not advantageous. She’s just doing it to show she has no fear, like they’re such a small threat that she doesn’t have to put on armor.
I think she wants to put up a front that she doesn't need armor because she is above that and stronger so she doesn't need armor
Like to either psych them out bc of how confident she is or it could potentially throw them into a frenzy from thinking that she doesn’t acknowledge them/efforts in turn potentially making them mad/reckless and in turn easier to deal with
There once was a famous strategist that was renowned for being incredibly clever. One time, he was facing an army much much larger than his own, and he had to figure out a way to defend a small place with very few people. So, he opened the doors and began to play music. The opposing general, knowing of the strategist's cleverness, immediately withdrew the army, fearing a trap.
How you present yourself can change the tides of battle.
Can someone explain to me how not wearing armor would be advantageous? I'm confused cuz how would they attack differently bc of what she wears?