but there's another interpretation about that embracing man sentence. What if Jihwa asked No Name to do Seungho, not himself? I mean Jihwa had accepted Seungho won't love him. Usually antagonist goes if I can't have them, I will ruin them. Maybe he wants No Name to ruin Seungho. As far as I know Seungho NEVER bottoms for anyone. Probably he thinks (for Seungho) being bottom is hurting Seungho's pride or such.
I know it's reaching and Byeonduck seems like open to some readers' suggestion about No Name being Jihwa's man. But ma'am, No Name banging Seungho is more hotter IMHO.
but there's another interpretation about that embracing man sentence. What if Jihwa asked No Name to do Seungho, not himself? I mean Jihwa had accepted Seungho won't love him. Usually antagonist goes if I can't have them, I will ruin them. Maybe he wants No Name to ruin Seungho. As far as I know Seungho NEVER bottoms for anyone. Probably he thinks (for Seungho) being bottom is hurting Seungho's pride or such.
I know it's reaching and Byeonduck seems like open to some readers' suggestion about No Name being Jihwa's man. But ma'am, No Name banging Seungho is more hotter IMHO.