Well, the plot isn't exactly around that ancient prince that abused his brother and that was mentionned in one bubble and was a rumour from the past not the truth written in archive but well, if you're out, we'll still appreciate the story of our litlle girl here ╮(￣▽￣)╭
What are you talking about man?
'Well, being black, the prince wasted no time raping his white sister'?
You'd be fine with that right?
See in that situation, I'd also be out. One bubble or not.
You're right for calling it out. As a gay man, I noticed and didn't appreciate that line too. Its reeks of homophobia.
No, I won't be fine with that
It was just a stupid line, not even a fact and we don't even know what the author thinks, we're just making an assumption
And I like this story
Yeah. Lets all calm down and see how the plot is going aye? . Since we dunno if thats true or not. I hope you guys dunt drop this manhwa
Your right it had incest too but I wouldn't drop it though cause this story has nothing to do with that prince im sure they wont even talk abt him again.
I'm so glad someone else noticed that line!!! That line honestly put me into a bad mood ngl.. It was so homophobic
please stop making problems over everything, it’s not surrounded as main plot point, nor does it affect the story.
So you just said it's not ok if it's racist but it's ok because it's homophobic?
Exact same situation. One you've decided wouldn't be ok and one you've decided is ok. You would have exactly the same amount of doubt as to the author's intention.
Doesn't seem logical to me.
Then why was it included?
Since this is dragging. I'm capping this off and leaving.
If it was a part of a character, it wouldn't bug me. Homophobia can be a part of a character. It wasn't.
I think it's really funny that all I implied is that the authors view on homosexuality was not ok because people are still using that as an excuse to kill us to this very day, and people are all like 'it's only one irrelevant line'.
Racial slurs can be one word.
The author said a bad thing.
And I'm not the bad guy for saying the author said a bad thing.
The author is the bad guy for saying what they said.
If you think I'm the bad guy for saying that view is wrong, maybe you hold that view yourself. And maybe that's why I called it out in the first place.
Right. I'm out.
Equivocating homosexuality with abuse. I don't know if it's the authors fault or the translator's. I'd wager the authors.
You don't do that. You NEVER do that.
That is EXACTLY what saw my brothers killed. What still sees them killed today.
And before anyone starts trying to say 'oh it's not doing that, it's just saying that he was homosexual'. No. The author wrote that specifically. If they didn't think there was a correlation, they would never have mentioned his sexuality.