Sigh. No (as you most probably have guessed) I'm not going to talk about the people who a...

ChuYang January 14, 2021 7:51 am

Sigh.

No (as you most probably have guessed) I'm not going to talk about the people who are expressing an honest opinion (after all, it's. An. Opinion. Just like yours) of what they think the actions of the main characters constitute. I want to talk about the people who try to suppress them because 'only uncritical opinions are ever allowed' or something. It's a public forum not a circle-jerk.

They also have the gall to read the comments that are critical of the MCs' relationship then complain that those commenters should just stop reading if they don't like a part of the story. So, basically, commenter A: makes a post about dubious consent in a story. Gets flamed for reading when they clearly don't like One Specific Thing about a story; Commenter B: makes a post about negative opinions in the comment section. Even if told by someone else to just stop reading if they don't like what the other comments have to say, wouldn't see the irony.

Another thing that makes me 'laugh' is how the ones who attack the more critical comments don't seem to realize that they're insulting the author. They imply that the story is about nothing more than the two main characters. Really? That's just like saying I should ignore my friend just because I don't like how they get angry so quickly all the time. And saying that's all there is to my friend. Which is insulting.

As for those points being made about Ren's current age and pedophilia in Japan, like someone else implied setting thirteen years old as the age of consent is just as arbitrary (as setting it at any other age before 25). On top of that that relationship between Hari and Ren began LONG before their current age.

The fact that this is an illegal site has no bearing either. In fact, if anything, it's more helpful to the other commenters not you. Why? Because pedophilia is illegal for a reason (lack of consent). Keeping websites like this illegal only means those who can't pay can't read. It does nothing to support the author. You can't force someone to pay when they simply don't have the money, full stop.

Finally, the fact that these readers acknowledge there is something problematic with a story they're reading is admirable not shameful as the rest of y'all are implying.

Responses
    Yodie.anonny May 6, 2021 11:17 am
    didn't? more like couldn't due to your inability to read. i doubt an ape as barbaric as u could even comprehend the argument in the first place. anyways i hope you rot during ur remaining time on earth :D bby dee

    Damn you still going seems like I live in your head rent free it’s funny how You’re so pressed abt a comment made by a person you’re never gonna meet hopefully you’ll get over it