
This would've been so fuxking cute but im uncomfortable idk dawg them being together and raising him to have him as a lover later idk dawg made me physically cringe idk its good but still

he didn't raise him as a lover good lord. so many people grossly misunderstood the events of the timeloop that we see. theo did find alois and take care of him for a couple years in childhood, but from the looks of it alois was sent off at a pretty young age and then returned of his own accord when he was older. theo cleary states he wanted alois to experience the world at a time before he thinks alois has fallen for him to ensure that he has every chance to find love elsewhere and without him. alois coming back is what makes the love story, not the duke, and the duke did not raise him like a father nor with any specific intent on making alois his lover.

I thought about this a lot. But there is a begining point in the timeline. Someone mentioned that if Alois gets his wish to be w/ the Duke in the original timeline then the loop would stop.
So yes. The beginning of the loop they met organically. But also the Duke didn't fall in love with Alois. He came to appreciate him and is wistful he would leave once he finds someone he loves. It doesn't necessarily mean he wants a romantic and sexual relationship with him. But once Alois has reached adulthood and kept professing his love to the duke that the Duke is like, no, this is just an illusion. And pushed him away. I don't think he ever picked him up with the intention of loving him sexually.

Fuck no he may be fine but hes an stupid idiot n evil for no reason at the most random times pls dont sleep with him yet dawg

Bro I'm not comparing him to others and I didn't say hes a super villain its like saying js cuz others are worse people with bad characters aren't bad js cuz they aint worse plus dawg I js want him to lock in and realize his feelings and not fucking degrade her i want them to be together actually as soon as he locks in and makes up for the shi he said n did in the past nothing more nothing less dont dwell on ma word choices too much

It’s not about comparison. Words have meaning and as a writer myself, I can’t just guess that you’re using the word loosely. Evil just means the peak of everything bad; it’s a word you use for someone vile and steeped in darkness, who is driven by nothing but malice. He ain’t it. While you might not think it’s all that deep, I just think using the right words matter or else they lose the meaning they’re meant to have.
I knew ut I literally said hes the brother as soon as she said she killed someone with a brother