I've usually enjoyed this sensei's manga but reading this one had left a perpetual bad taste in my mouth for their other ones too I think — I don't mind nor care for child-like (in apperance and sometimes even in personality or mannerisms) MC, just as a preference that the artist may have since I do hv my own preferences when creating characters. Seeing this manga's 2nd couple, and how easily it was brushed away felt so... uncomfortable, like it feels as though the mangaka also thinks that it's not as serious of an issue whereas with certain mangaka dealing with these themes, like Harada, I can kinda say that yea this author's actual morals do not reflect what they write. This one though... idk maybe I'm just being dramatic.
Im pretty sure with the way they portrayed sui's recovery and how angel made him open up the author knew what they were doing. It looked very well studied (someone even suggested the author might have experienced something like it as well but its just conjecture)The second couple is just kink stuff and most likely doesnt reflect their morals, why would it?
I get you, like i said that was probably just to add age gap which might be one of the things the artist is into ╮( ̄▽ ̄")╭ its also probably shown as normalized because at the start of the story they say that human trade is normal
Since they used the word "in his teens" i just choose to believe hes 18
Skipped the rape scenes cus I'm not about that but I'm intruiged about the story. So his brothee is not actually his brother? That sibling test paper thing got like .9 or smth as a result, so that's what I'm assuming. So, it's pretty much a Stockholm syndrome, kinda, where get used to the life and stayed? I'm a bit confused











I think bro's bouta be impaled, by a knife or a dick idk but the latter seems more likely based on that very shy, very demure expression on the last panel
I mf laughed so hard reading this lolll so fr