pretty cute but chapter 4 definitely weirded me out with that last scene (i mean does it count as SA if its a dream??) I love this authors work most of the time though and its dope as fuck how much theyve improved their artstyle you can really see it with their perspectives and lighting
As far as I'm aware, dream rape is a legal grey area, but I'm no lawyer
Man if i based rape on solely legality it wouldn't universially apply since lawmakers funky asses like to do backflips with the laws on this. im just mentioning it really cause people get them triggers from any sort of SA-like situation but dream rape definitely not what happened so we good on that shit
Finally an actual switch couple but then they put in the unnecessarily dick sucking while hes asleep CAN WE STOP WITH THE SOMNOPHILIA EVERYTHING ABOUT TS WAS GOOD EXCEPT THAT I feel like authors cant help but slip in sexual assault the fuck wrong with these artists man can yall let me be happy
https://www.mangago.zone/read-manga/camping/uu/br_chapter-187051/pg-22/
shit be so annoying cause i really fucked with andrew too (was the realest mf)
I mean it’s not SA if it’s consensual.. If it’s regularly Nathan most likely said he was into consensual somonophilia.
Sleeping people cant consent, so it'll never be consensual. Sleep play (as in fake sleeping) is the consensual alternative but sucking a sleeping persons dick is sexual assault cmon man it takes a google search to realise sleeping people cant consent You cant consent for your sleeping self either because sleeping people INHERENTLY cant consent. Quit trippin
it’s THEIR relationship, they can set up the rules as they please. labeling something that is clearly within the bounds of their enjoyment and pleasure as SA literally is a large contributor to why people don’t believe real victims. stop diluting the severity of SA just because you don’t like people’s kinks.
Sexual assault is objective man, your personal opinion doesnt cahnge the objectivity that sleeping people cant consent. Im not diluting the severity of SA im highlighting the value of what is actually consensual. Reality is often difficult.
SA is objective IN THE LENS OF THE VICTIM. yes consent is important but consent differs between parties and here no one is dying, no one is emotionally/physically traumatized. if two people enjoy something between themselves, a third party jumping in to call it assault is why so many people think that SA accusations is just because of sexual regret or a minor inconvenience.
and either way, this logic doesn’t even hold up because if sleeping people cannot consent, medical professionals would be getting sued left and right in spite of previously signed consent forms for operating on sedated patients.
is it still SA though if both parties made clear that they were okay with waking the other like that