Godcomplex's Topics (12)

They just want a convenient scapegoat. :v After all, if there’s no ultimate villain then where will they direct all their anger?

exactly.

True. If we can’t be mad at somebody then I suppose we can’t be mad at all and that’s no fun.

The king isn't the villain, but he is A villain. And don't come and tell me that there is no one to blame. There is, each and every one of those who mistreated her. And don't get me started with the goddess. She just doesn't give a crap and shifts the blame onto the victim to feel better with herself. This forgiving crap is getting on my nerves. I would sit and watch the world crumble while drinking piña colada. （￣へ￣）

Lol, I did say people want to direct their anger somewhere.

It is really terrifying if you really think it's no ones fault.
Let's put it this way, if a id is bullied in a class, is the teacher who knows and does nothing no to blame? is the kid that sees everything and laughs not to blame? is the ones that bully him not to blame because the whole class is in on it? The fact that there are a lot of people doing bad doesn't, and the fact that the blame doesn't just fall onto one person doesn't mean they are all innocent, and it is most definitely not "directing my anger somewhere". Do you really think that if the kid that was bullied commits suicide, all of those who mistreated him, berated him, and humiliated them on a daily basis are innocent? Maybe they didn't pull the trigger, but they are responsible for it. And that is exactly what I'm talking about. It's not "looking for a scapegoat" it's to take responsibility for one's actions and their consequences, because, with your logic, if there is a group big enough of people the responsibility just disappears. That my friend is mass mentality and it's the reason in multiple occasions people have died in the streets surrounded buy passer bys. And by the way, the fact that you say "people want to direct their anger somewhere" shows that you, on one hand have no anger which leads me to believe that 1 you have never been in a situation or have had some loved one in this situation, and 2 you have no empathy whatsoever.

You can explain it however you want but people using the goddess as the true villainess is clearly just looking for a scapegoat to redirect their anger. It's clear that the author did not intend for it to happen and y'all are just yapping like puppies.

Also, tag OP if you want to argue about the whole "if you really think it's no one's fault" instead of telling strangers on the internet that they have no empathy whatsoever. It makes you look like an ass. (◡ ‿ ◡ ✿)

Just forget it... I said what I had to, it clearly went over you and I really don't care if you understand my point or not.
On the other hand, the original poster did say everyone was to blame, wich is, exactly my point. It's just you who got weirdly defensive on this matter. ╮(￣▽￣)╭

Nah, I think you wouldn't have said anything if I hadn't made the comment about people wanting to direct their anger somewhere. My original scapegoat comment makes sense.

I’ll say real quick, regarding your analogy I agree. But I don’t think it quite holds up nor do I think you understood what I was getting at. It’s a man vs society. That isn’t to say there is no villain but that the villainy is spread out among a corrupt society and that everyone must accept some blame because while you can’t point any fingers neither can you justify that there is no fault at all. What the goddess and the king and everyone else did was awful and they are by no means good, but that doesn’t make them the villain. Using your analogy, if a kid commits suicide because they were bullied, not by just one person but many, and on top of that no one does anything about it, can you say the bully is to blame for this child’s death? or the circumstances that led the bully to believe that was an appropriate way to treat others? The problem is systematic and cannot be solved by eliminating one bad person that’s what I mean by man vs society.