Is this shonen-ai ? I see it in the tags so I'm asking ? Enjoy. (●'◡'●)ﾉ
First two seasons are shounen ai (but dark and mature). Third season will be a full yaoi according to the author with sex scenes.
Okay, thank you for answering :3
The end ? Well okay, but what this chapter have to do with the end of the one before ? Who was that person ? What was this scene ? So much question so little answer.
So that's who you chose. If it's what makes you happy then go for it.
Poor Ian tho ╮(￣▽￣)╭ He deserve someone incredible because he himself is. He don't deserve a broken heart...
Wtf I meant Jo. I'm dumb.
Noooo they won't have time to do anything (づ￣ ³￣)づ Please don't walk in on them Σ( ￣□￣||) the second hand embarassment ⁄(⁄ ⁄·⁄ω⁄·⁄ ⁄)⁄
This blonde bitch, sorry I don't like him, he's deceiving this poor megane guy too, he seems lovely. And uke, you twat, you for real ???? You lying again to seme ??? When he learn that you're fomenting something with the blonde bitch and that you BETRAY him AGAAAAIN UUUGHHH I can't handle bitch like that. That said, I love the drawings, especially the faces, up close they can come as simple but they're all on point everytime whoever it is, I love it.
Man, I cried almost all the chapter it's the first time ever in my life.
I hate you, I hate you Pilwon, I hate you so much. I fucking hate you oh my god, why fo you exist ? You fucking piece of shit. I can't belive I'm gonna say this but I hate him more than people who hurted me irl, I MEAN IT. It's the worst, this piece of shit is really well-writen I can't tell otherwise I fucking hate him he made me fucking cry I want to kill him myself fr. Man, I need to touch some grass it can't be.
They're so cute together ! The only thing I need is to uke to aknowledge his feelings ! He thinks too low of himself I don't like that ! I feel sorry for him, he's not a lowlife ! ╥﹏╥
Sorry if everyone hate my comment but... I just can't like seme, I want him to suffer. And for the reminder, uke's at no fault for sleeping with his married boss, 100% of the fault is on the boss, because the only one cheating is the boss since he's the only one in a commitment. That said... seme's character and psychology piss me off so fucking much. Uke grow, alone, falling out of love of his cheating boss naturally, that's a bif deal. And they weren't even in a relationship since 6 months so... but seme is full of himself, forceful and so fucking FULL OF HIMSELF !!! I wanted uke to play really hard to get !!! And when seme played with a girl on purpose in front of a motel to make uke jealous UGH just fuck off bitch. (︶︿︶)＝凸
Sigh... but the sex is hot, what a waste... I won't read this again but the sex HNNNG !!!! (￣∇￣")
nah it's the uke fault too you don't get with married or take people period. For 5 years too that's a lot of time to reflect and cut off. People who only blame people who are in the relationship and not also people with get with others while knowing they are taken are hypocrites
Well, everyone got their opinions of course, but I could learn and change my mind after doing philosophy for more than 10 years, you learn a lot. I really was like you before... but now if my man cheat on me it will be 100% his fault not the other person, because it's my boyfriend who made a promise to me for loyalty and fidelity, not the other person. It can kinda be different if he cheats on me with my sister/cousin/bestfriend of course because they have loyalty and fidelity to you as well. But imagine the other person doesn't know your bf is married to you, how is this their fault ? And you can tell me that the uke knows is crush is married ? But then what ? The one who pledged loyalty to the wife is the husband, not the uke, the doing adultary and judged by the justice is the husband, and there's a reason for that, it's because it's his fault, nobody forced him to cheat, he did it because he wanted to. He could say no, but more than that he engaged the relationship himself, so it's his fault. But I can't really explain here, philo is long and hard. But still, I don't try to change your mind, I'm just explaining mine, cause every human has an opinion and they all have the right to have it. :)
understandable with the we all have our own opinion. but what I'm saying is that you don't get with people who are taken or married because that's normal decency I'm not saying the man in the relationship is not responsible. What I'm saying is that people who get with others knowing they are in a relationship are disgusting. I do agree with what you're saying too just that people tend to say we'll I'm not the one who cheated and expect to leave with 0 consequences
Yeah, I totally get your point. I don't take him responsible, but it's only my own opinion but I totally understand that you do and even a lot of people do too ! It's just my mindset now but it's just MINE of course so, yeah, I get what you're saying and I understand how you feel about it. Thanks for having an adult conversation with me without judging x) (▰˘◡˘▰)
A little late here, but in my opinion, it's more about self-respect and worth. If the person didn't know they were dating a cheater, it's not their fault, they may even be considered a victim. However, if a person is dating someone and knows that person is cheating, then that person is just reducing themselves to the same level as the cheater. Know your worth, don't be part of a scheme that destroys someone else's life. Sometimes it's better to let go even if you love them to death.
Now that the uke talk about Picasso, I'm reminded how a lot of people refer at him for art... like, wtf ? It's even worse when I see women praise him... do you know he's a rapist and a pedophile... ? He's a child criminal, a mysoginist piece of shit and an homophobic person. I'm quoting a french journal (because I'm french)
- ""« En 1937, il a fait 53 œuvres qui s’appellent La Femme qui pleure. (…) des portraits d’une femme en larmes, le visage déformé par la douleur et l’angoisse. Et à chaque fois, le modèle c’est Dora Maar. »"" TRAD : "In 1937, he did 53 piece of art who're called <The women who cry> (...) portraits of a woman crying, her face deformed by the pain and anguish. Every time, the model was Dora Maar (his wife)." because he beat her up, sometime rape her and then paint her.
-""Lorsqu'elle rencontre Picasso en 1926, elle est alors une adolescente de 17 ans, encore au lycée; lui en a 45"" : "When she met Picasso in 1926, she's a teenager of 17, still in school and he's 45." This man's so disgusting and everyone say his name all the time, he should be forgotten.
- ""« J’ai lu ce qu’ont laissé les maîtresses, les épouses, les enfants. Au début des années 1950, par exemple, il confisque leur passeport à deux petites Américaines venues le voir. Il leur prodigue ‘des gâteries’ – quel euphémisme sordide – pendant deux jours avant de leur rendre leurs papiers »"" : "I've read what is mistress left behind, his wifes, the childrens. At early 1950, for exemple, he take the passport of two little american girl who came to see him. He'll do some "treat" on them - what an understatment - for two days before giving their passport back.
- "après la guerre 39-45, Picasso a eu de nombreuses liaisons avec de jeunes mineures, attirées par son « aura » et sa célébrité." TRAD : "After the war 39-45, Picasso had a lot of affairs with young minors, who were attracted by his aura and celebrity.
Freaking disgusting.
If you're interested in more information about what Picasso did, I can show you youtube video of a woman on youtube who is a professor in history and made a video about him of about 8 minutes, she talk french but there's english subtitle. So please, just know what a piece of shit he is, a criminal to say the least. Love on you all.
LINK : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsuLpUTs50c
(Put the english subtitle :) ! )
Thanks for the information. Do you recommend alternative artists?
I'm 100% this information was hidden from the public and we were brainwashed dinto thinking he was such a great artist and still is that's why so many webcomics mention him even in any art class they're always mentioning him and I would've stuck with the belief that he was such a great guy had it not been for this comment, more people need to know about this
Well I can recommend but I don't know any artist who ressemble picasso's and I'm sure the two I'll recommend you know already, it's Vincent Van Gogh who was truly mistreated his entire life and died young and alone and Claude Monet which I love, he even continue painting while losing his sight and it's true overwelming and beautiful. But art is really personal so I don't know if you'll like :)
I agree with you, at first I didn't dare talk about it here because... Who am I after all to talk about such delicate subject, but I learned so much about it that I thought maybe it would interest some of you to know the truth about this despicable human, I'm happy if I can make see the truth to some people who wants to know.
Thank you soooo much for sharing! I totally agree. It's incredibly saddening and maddening how
many vile cis men have been held up as icons, when really they destroyed so many people to get to that position
Also like to add that a lot of the art he's most famous for was basically appropriated from African sculptors and general African art. He blatantly and deliberately refused to credit this origin.
I don't know if what you said is true, but I know you don't need to be a good person to be good at something and you're not a bad person if you like something created by a bad person.
That's why lot of people like and praise his art, they're praising the artist, not the man
So, I can understand what you're trying to say, for many person it can be the case, but I think that for this specific person a lot of people just don't know what he did and what kind of person it was, so I don't know if what you say apply for this person in particular. For me in particular, I didn't know until recently but I never liked his art anyway so nothing's changed but if I (or the video of a female professionnal who talk and explain better than I am) can change the mind of some people who didn't know, then I'm happy. Otherwise... well... you are free to like what you want, even if I don't agree I have to tolerate because I can't impose on someone, of course. :)
And lastly, you say that you don't know if what I'm saying is true. Of course I'm no one, but the professor in history in the video is stating fact, then you can also look for yourself, it's not so hard, even in his painting, more than 50 painting of his are called "Le viol" : "The rape" I don't know what you need more... ? But you're free to think whatever you want !
Yes, in my opinion, we should always dissociate the people from what they did, even people we think are scum. That's my way of thinking, at least.
I always thought people want perfect heroes, but in real life, nobody is perfect and a man beating his wife can save a drowning child. Is he a good man, does it change what he did? No. He just did a good thing. The child's family should still be greatful for his act. It would have been a morally easier choice if only good people did good things, but it's not always the case.
And I understand that you're so disgusted by Picasso's deed that you think the fact that he's an internationaly respected artist is undeserving. You can, of course,judge him from this point of view.
I justed wanted to explain to you why some people still respect his art, while some think like you do.
Yes, I totally get what you mean, it's actually a deep and hard subject in philo and there's not a good answer, there's a lot of answers but there's no right or wrong one, just opinion to each individual. You exemple remind me of a character in one of my favorite video game, Mass Effect, it's a person called Samara, who's a 1000yo and chose to act for justice in the galaxy, meaning she won't let anyone die for injustice and die to save them, beeing a thousand people or just one person who's victim of injustice, and in the game we talk a lot with her and her vision of justice. And our character ask her how she can jugde a person ? What if he did good before doing wrong ? Etc... and I'll just never forget what she say. It's not an answer it's just a way of thinking "But if I have to kill a man for his crime, do I really have to know he was a loving father ?" And it was probably one of the first time I interogated myself of what's good or bad ? Right or wrong ?
Anyway haha... sorry. I get your point, but I want to let people at least know what it was so they can actually have a choice of still loving his art or not. Not knowing is not a bad thing but knowing is better.
You say we should always dissociate the art from the artist, I don't know if that work in everything but I think I mostly agree with you. I didn't like Picasso's work before knowing like I said so that doesn't change anything that I know, but it changes my perception of the human he was now, not the work he did. I don't know if that's clear. That's why I wan more people to know the human.