
Do u guys think -constant- rape punishment is okay? (Not defending that asshole, not justifying, genuinely wondering about y'all opinion on this.)

I dunno maybe I wouldn't if this was real life but considering all the crap that Euihyun and Euiyoung went through because of him I think in this instance it's justified. We still try people for murder even if they didn't necessarily kill the person only if they were a force in making it happen. Kim Sahyeok was a force in Euihyun getting raped. ┑( ̄Д  ̄)┍

No .... but because it is fictionnal I'll allow it .... and with my weaked mind (trained by years of yaoi bl) my first thought when i saw the dad with the other alpha who will "train" him was : oh ... that would be a nice trope for another bl .... they could catch feeling or whatever
But the main point is no.
Still we are in a bl world ... that means fictionnal and also rape is commun thing we read, more often with omegawerse (i'm not tryind to justify, more like an explanation of why some of us readers don't even blink from that)

Not really, I preferred if they just kill off the character tbh. However, considering the title (an eye for an eye) I'm guessing it's something he did as well (raping) that's why that's his punishment. I thought it'd be the other way around with the ugly guy who got tied up in his position since that one's the one that tried to put his hands on Euihyun but ig not. Anyway, answer is no. Lmao.

the thing is, people are missing how they're enabling more rape. okay the father is a pos, but then there's someone who is actively raping him. that old man who is not even involved in anything is clearly is okay with raping someone, and you're allowing him to do that. you're supporting a rapist too. and I mean, if it really is an eye for an eye why doesn't taeju go through the same thing? he was allowed to redeem himself when he raped and abused the mc for half of the story, but the father isn't allowed to do the same? (not defending him, I think neither should have redemption but the double standards are a little crazy here)

If you're genuinely asking for our opinion, well I'd say yes only because it's fake, but in real life 100% no(not saying "oh it's ok to be ok w it bc you've gone through it" bc that's stupid I still don't support it) it's just he gave up his Omega son to them knowing he would get raped as well and sexually assaulted, he admitted himself that that's the reason he gave him, so to me this seems befitting, although killing him or just torture outside of rape would've worked well too.

I've got to be honest, to me it doesn't really make a difference if the character is punished in that sense or killed or tortured, they're all terrible. I understand that saying rape is terrible, it is, but this manga literally has abuse and shit, you could arguably use the same argument with that, but I believe if you're going to dish something out you better be prepared to receive the same thing back. Of course if it was real life it would be different, but in novels, I think of it as dramatic irony, because that's what it is in a piece of fiction, a literature technique

I totally agree. Like this shouldn't happened. But because it is this type of story where rape is part of the story, torture and blakmail and violence and everything, the fact that it is his sentence dosent chock me. That doesnt mean I agree with the author choice.
However if the story between the MC and ML would have been more light more rainbows and flowers, the choice for rape as a punishment would be completely choking. And I think that is why some of us doesnt care or even agree with the author choice.
OMG HE'S SO PRETTY