
yall annoying asf u literally saw the cover and the tags so idk what u expected If u dont like it just dont read and move on

It really doesn’t, sexual depictions of children even if they are fictional are illegal in a lot of places. “It’s just fictional” is not an excuse at all actually, newsflash, media does shape our expectations and standards for society. Normalizing child abuse and r*pe in media actually impacts real life, not to mention that it’s harmful to actual survivors. You are genuinely so ignorant and gross , I cannot believe i have to argue with someone wether child prn should exist or not

If you do not want to look affected by criticism, then stop replying to comments criticizing pedophilic works by telling them they should not criticize it. I am however very confuse by that last sentence : why read CP if you are not interested in real children? I am disgusted by your "kink" but I would like to understand.

this manga is not csam as csam involves real children. you are misguided and using an incorrect, outdated term - you dislike this manga and are making it everyone elses problem. you are not critiquing anything and are throwing around serious terms and labels as if they mean nothing. you don't wish to understand anything, your mind is made up and so is mine. this conversation is not going to go anywhere so give up

“Childporn” is not an outdated term and is quite literally what this is. “csam” does deal with real children, that’s why no one called it that? They said CP, ur literally strawman-ing. This whole “Agree to disagree” is also so ridiculous. It’s apparent you simply want to disregard criticism because your viewpoint is indefensible and you don’t want to be confronted. And again, “it’s just fiction” doesn’t apply here. There is enough evidence to prove that these things perpetuate irl sexual attraction and abuse towards children. I would recommend to educate yourself on this but ig ur not familiar with that.

Yet you still won’t answer the question.. why read and defend it, if you are not attracted to children? Call it whatever you want. It’s still csam because it depicts the sexual abuse of a child, even if the child is fictional. It literally does not matter, it is still classified as child sexual assault material and it should be.
Again, there is enough research done on this topic. Fictional childporn/csam is also harmful. Not only is it harmful for survivors but it also does change and solidify your preferences, because you are literally seeing children in a sexual context for entertainment. This content is made for pedophiles by pedophiles, and you are very obviously one of them, otherwise you would not be wasting your time trying so desperately to defend it. Get help.
YAYAYYYYYAYSY