Isn't that an unfair trial tho? If the church is the one to accuse and church is the one to rule over the case, they would need to work 300% harder to win against the church
Unfortunately that's just the way it is. The church has the masses in their pocket, so no matter if it's unfair, if the people believe in the church they have absolute authority. To fight them and prove otherwise is hard.
Don't scare me like this. There's quite a bit of foreshadowing going on here ╥﹏╥
Some people are saying that they wanted to see eiser being the one desperate here while serena is being desperate till the end is something I relate to but for me this also shows serena's growth to me. That she has grown enough to lay herself bare in front of a person she came along to trust. Also good Lord serena is soooooo pretttyyyyyyyy(*≧∀≦*)
NO NO NOOOOO WHAT DO UH MEAN A HIATUS RIGHT NOW? WHAT DO UH MEAN UH WILL BE BACK BEFORE AUTUMN!??????? (-----___-----) （ΩДΩ）
Ahh yes, the chocolate cake is the most important(▰˘◡˘▰)
Ok, so I got a slightly swayed (my opinion didn't change tho that she should be with ml, and I missed him very much this ch too) so I went back to 1st ch to see if she really misunderstood. Here's verbatim what he said on the phone call (I took these from the 'official translation' but the other translation almost said 96% of same stuff so I don't think there is anything lost in translation)
"Have I ever been attracted to her? I don't think so. Not once since we met. But there are different kinds of love other than the one between men and women. I'm still going to marry her if that's what yumin wants. After all she basically saved my family. I'll always be there to take care of her and tell her that I love her everyday if that's what's she wants. I'm going to live rest of my life like that to repay her. "
I mean either I'm dumb or this is completely different from what's he saying now. After hearing that, I don't think there was ANY miscommunication. I think he likes her completely platonically as a friend. Why is he trying to get her back even after he knows she likes someone else now, I dunno. Maybe he is just too used to her loving him unconditionally and it made him feel like others. I really dunno
Very methodological of you, I approve! I was gonna do that myself but you saved me the effort ty ty
(●'◡'●)ﾉ
Give up ur love she says, as all of this started because she loved a man.
I mean to be fair not her fault but that mf who caused her the pain and suffer.
True, but she also got warned by everyone around her to not trust him. And also the curse was all her doing
The victim blaming is crazy she loved that man and believed he loved her too. When she found out the person she loved killed her child and ppl she loved she would obv go insane. The curse thing is understandable but the one who started this was the dude who couldn't communicate his feelings.
I am not sure what I said implied victim blaming but that wasn't my intention. I never said anything about it being all her fault, obviously the guy manipulated her, but I think u jumped the too far considering I have only written 2 sentences in which I never said anything about disliking much less hate anyone. My first comment was just my thoughts, which weren't meant to be taken too deeply. Just saying that if anyone could stop loving someone at choice, things all around the world would have been much easier
Ooo this is gonna be long but even if u didn’t intend to victim-blame, the way you phrased it can still come across that way.
"all of this started because she loved a man" makes it seem like her love was the cause of everything, when in reality, the blame should be on the man who manipulated her and the circumstances that led to the curse. Love itself isn’t a mistake, and that wording makes it sound like her suffering is a direct consequence of her feelings rather than the result of betrayal, manipulation, or unfortunate circumstances. This is like telling someone who got scammed, "Well, it's because you trusted them," instead of blaming the scammer. The issue isn't that she loved someone, it’s what the man did and how the situation unfolded.
Another example is when you wrote, "she also got warned by everyone around her to not trust him" This implies that since she was warned, she should have known better, and whatever happened was her responsibility. This is a classic example of victim-blaming because it assumes that ignoring warnings means someone deserves the consequences. People don’t always listen to warnings for various reasons such as hope, love, emotional manipulation, or simply not believing the worst in someone. Holding that against them oversimplifies the situation and ignores the complexities of human emotions and trust. Imagine telling someone who stayed in an abusive relationship despite warnings, "Well, you were told not to trust them." That dismisses the abuser's actions and places unnecessary blame on the victim for being hopeful or manipulated.
It’s not that I think you outright blamed her, but statements like these (even unintentionally) can still reinforce the idea that she brought this on herself rather than acknowledging the manipulation.I get that your comment wasn’t meant to be that deep, but u def were victim blaming.
Ok i get where u are coming from and honestly I don't care much about the past of the story to blame her or even think about her or the guy much but I'll choose my words better in the future. But honestly, you need to choose your words better too.
His hair is looking good this chapter (●'◡'●)ﾉ