Sensei's Topics (132)

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhh

jeez but i agree(⊙⊙ )

LMAOOO

(⊙…⊙ ) oh my...d-did you do it before??

Oh ok ok.....(๑•ㅂ•)و✧

Yep, she’s the saintess apparently even though it hasn’t been brought up since the beginning really. It wasn’t really said in detail either.

It doesn’t really seem like she’s really been put into a situation to need to use it yet. But there’s no telling if she even knows how to use it when technically she only read the novel, so she doesn’t have the character’s exact memories. So probably doesn’t even know how to use magic let alone her saintess magic. If she can’t then it’s likely only to come out when she’s in real danger. Then again there’s no telling exactly what her saintess magic does since it hasn’t been explained in detail yet. For now I’m assuming mostly healing or purification like most saintess things usually are but that could be bad since the demon lord is sticking to her. It’s possible he can be weakened by it or something like that.
Anyway I hope they explain it soon. Kinda would like to see the demon lord’s reaction to finding out she’s the saintess.

but what about itty bitty Miss Earthborn ;-; she looks too adorable to be evil

Sometimes the adorable ones are the evil ones, you never know ;)

My little cousin is adorable but she's a meanie, a brat and a bully so-

no, not this one. her eyes are devoid of the evil my sister's contains

see...this is y i wish it had smut

Can the Duke get a second chance? Just him? Pretty pls (=・ω・=)

She wont forgive them...cos its the real penelope’s right to do so but duke and boys will have character development ( still trashy ngl)~~~novel ~~

She does have the right to forgive them

╥﹏╥ ok

Hmmm? I just shared what i read in the novel ~~

K? I read novel spoilers so I know the gist. Regardless, if this is her new life she has to live it for herself. If she wanted to she could forgive them for what they've done to her or give them a second chance.

What do you mean by woman can get pregnant with another woman? Where did you get that idea?

Thats defying biology and medicine. Its the first time I heard it, it sure is bizarre.

knochenmark means nothing else than bone marrow. IF that actually works, it would require a huge and technically advanced operation, taking out the bone marrow as well as transplanting the genetic information into the female eggs to fertilize them. Which is, obviously, far from possible in this setting. Also, men are physically superior in general. which means that the war wouldn't even escalate into two parties but the men would remain supreme in typical physical combat. Even IF the women managed to fight to a standstill, having no interaction will led to incest as well as the dying of both parties. Which means the treaty they had does make kind of sense. If the women started not handing over the babies, the men would instantaneously start tow wage war, in which the women are, as stated before, disadvantaged.
After all this rant: I do agree with you that women hold grudges far longer and more intense than men and are way more insidious, so their advantage may well be in a tactical one.
Although I heard about single females being able to get pregnant without insemination by some weird trick of nature in the animal kingdom, I have yet to hear of a case happening between humans. And the chance of it happening would be so low, they would all die.
If you read this far, good job and thank you :D

I also think, that if it came to such a conflict, women would win in the end. Men are mostly stronger and more impulsive. Women are more cooperative, shrewd, durable and able to do the unthinkable for others sake. They also keep in mind the wellbeing of others (less casualities in the long run). So, if it is not like a blitzkrieg, the longer a conflict would last- the surerer the winner would be women.

I disagree with that. The problem is women around each other. When there is no man around, all their aggressiveness is turned upon another. On the other hand, when there is no women around, men rarely get into conflicts.
I do not think that women are more cooperative when it comes to completing tasks, because men are generally better in specializing and thus leaving other specialists to do their job, whereas women seem to be generally better being multitaskers, thus making clear structure and task management less obvious. Assuming a general altruistic trait in women is also something I disagree on. It is a social construct paired with motherly instincts that shows these traits in today's society as something women are supposed to portray, but I doubt it was even close to being the same a few hundred years ago. Women are not more durable in general. Not at all. If you aim at pain endurance, mental endurance and similar topics as to my knowledge. "to do the unthinkable" is only what is unexpected coming from a women. Men and women are both able to show incredible feats depending on their situation. I do agree on women being more shrewd though :D
I hope I did not misinterpret anything and welcome the opportunity to have my mind changed :D This is not a hate rant on women. I hope -.-'

Omg stop. All of you. There isn't much difference between men and women's thinking. That's just stupid society not letting go of thousands of years old stereotypes.
In the end, it depends on the individual. Even with physical strength. I know so many women who could kick any man's ass.

I have to talk about three points.
First of all: there is a difference in thinking between men and women because of hormonial differences.
second: I do agree that a lot of our "differences" are because of society and culture. Nonetheless, this resulted in a different way of thinking.
third: of course there are many women who could kick a mans ass. But not only do the men have an advantage biologically in general, but on the extremes there are far more men who are strong and great fighters than women,
In my opinion, your comment is actually the epitome of sociacultural influence, as people have become too scared to talk about differences because of the equality movement. No doubt we should acknowledge each others equal rights, but we also need to accept the diferences.

I actually agree with Pandiolium.
The majority of the perceived differences are sociocultural. Most people aren't that different. But if we look at the extremes, the most "typically masculine" would be almost all male and "typically feminine" - female.
Also the hormonal thing. It is real, it does influence us. As a woman I can go on for days about it. Does it correlate completely with the sociocultural stereotypes? Definitely not! Does it justify prejudice? No. We are a human being and a person first and foremost.
Fun fact. There really are more differences betwen men or women, than there are betwen men and women.
Fun fact 2. If people can choose and do what they like without the pressure of gender norms (a scandinavian Experiment), then they tend to prefer activities and choices more typical to their gender. The scientists of that experiment wanted to prove the opposite though...
And the issue with strong females. I also know several women, who are stronger than most men. Those who I know loose only to one kind of men-their male blood relative.

I full on agree with everything you said.
I also heard about the Scandinavian experiment and think it is very interesting. In my opinion, the difference in itself does not really present a problem, but the value and worth that is attached does. If, for example, jobs in the social sector had a better monetary as well as societal value, that would solve far more problems than trying to eradicate the differences. It is not the "what" and "why" it is different, but "how" we engage with it.

I also agree with you :)
Even with the patriarchy it is the same thing- the inequality of "worth" between the sexes is the problem. And that when one of the parties does not do his/her part in earnest and fair, then the consequences are very unequal. And the means to object, influence or just freedom of choice is very ineqal. That is a social thing.

Ayy people. " There isn't much difference" doesn't exclude ANY difference, why are you arguing. "too scared to talk about differences because of the equality movement" I have to laugh.
"There really are more differences betwen men or women, than there are betwen men and women." This is what I tried to say I guess. I'm curious as to how they conducted this experiment because you can't really keep people from coming in contact with society's gender roles?

right....