In some shots Leo’s hair looks like a mullet and in side shots not so much. So he parties in the back sometimes?
What’s going on with your eyes man... eh who am I kidding, your so pretty I’d be okay with you being my stalker/kidnapper
I like the 180 in a matter of like minutes. But when you see a hot bod offered up to you like that. I get it. Lol
It's completed on this site https://genkan.io/manga/1438530395-warriors-afterlife
Moderns shoes, with eyelets and rubber. But no modern medicine.....
Shoes with laces have been around for thousands of years. With eyelets and laces, hundreds of years. 1790.. I don't know why you think it's a rubber sole tho?
That style of shoe hasn’t been around since 1790- earliest for that style probably 1920’s. Metal eyelets of that nature wasn’t used till early 1900. It’s a rubber sole because of the firm formed peaks on the bottom of the shoe-, leather, wood or bone wouldn’t be shaped like that for a shoe.
Snip from FrockFlicks dot com... talking about metal grommets used in clothing.
"In addition to corsets (which were were strictly underwear or cabaret garb until the 1980s), metal grommets were also commonly used in boots and shoes in the 19th century and early 20th century"
So from 1800 to 1900 metal grommets were commonly used in shoes.
Here's another snippet from the History of Sneakers:
"In the late 18th century, people wore rubber soled shoes called plimsolls, but they were pretty crude?for one thing, there was no right foot or left foot. Around 1892, the U.S. Rubber Company came up with more comfortable rubber sneakers with canvas tops, called Keds."
TBH, this just interests me because I like to know the origins of things and you peaked my interest:) I felt I had seen photos and paintings of laced up footwear similar to her slippers from the past before, but wasn't sure.
Yeah kinda proved my point
wait , how did it prove your point? You said earliest for that eyelets and rubber soles wasn't used until the early1900's.
I found articles that show metal eyelets used on women's shoes were used as far back as 1837. In fact lacing up shoes goes far far back into history. And you said the it wasn't possible it was a rubber sole based on how it was drawn. hmm.. I can't argue because every artist has their own style. But I showed you that in the 18th century people did where footwear with rubber soles.
Well you said that rubber use on shoes in the 1892 was crude, and couldn’t differentiate between what foot. The rubber sole on the shoe drawn was not crude in the least. They are well defined and given a design for gribbing the ground in rough terrain (military style)- not crude in the least. And from my education in costume design (which granted I graduated a long time ago) the shoes from this time period wouldn’t have had the size or style of that type of grommet. But I will concede on the eyelets since there isn’t a specific time period or geographical specified location, so they could be more advance in that.... but not medicine for some reason.
And honestly I was just trying to make a “funny”. Not really calling the artist out or anything. Obviously I’m a fan.
Is this a novel? If so where can I read it?