WARNING!! →→→SENSIYIVE TOPIC!!!

I have a genuine question,

Do you think criminals who sexually torture(also other types of gruesome sexual torture) other people don't deserve rape ? For instance, 44 days of hell, the men that did sexual gruesome torture to a girl just because she said no, do you think they still don't deserve to be raped? Or sexually and gruesomely tortured? I asked my friends and acquaintances about this, some say they do, some say they deserve more, but mostly they say no, they don't really explain why they do and why they don't deserve the same treatment they unleashed to their victims. But when I asked if someone killed a person, do they deserve to be killed? Most of them said yes. I understand why they think it's okay to kill a criminal who killed other people since the loved ones of those victims can't be brought back. Is it not the same when some is sexually tortured or raped? Is because they're alive that's why they don't "deserve" it? Why? Victims of those sexual activities could possibly not be not be the same because of the trauma , they might be alive but, mentally, they aren't. I'm talking about not just accidental sexual harassment, I'm talking about sexual tortures and rape that were done on purpose for the criminal's "enjoyment".
I just can't understand the concept why they don't deserve the same torture they've shown to the victims, when they are just demons in disguised in humam masks. Do they believe those criminals that, they'll change because of just a little bit of jail time? Because I don't think so.

But just to be clear. I'm not emphasizing that accidental sexual harassment is excused.