AGAIN, WTF KINDA READING COMPREHENSION IS THAT? I SAID THE KID WILL LIVE IN MISERY BECAUSE THE TOWN IS IN SHAMBLES, THE TOWN IS IN SHAMBLES BECAUSE THE PEOPLE TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THE SYSTEM, THE PEOPLE TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THE SYSTEM BECAUSE THEY WEREN'T AS STRICT AS THEY SHOULD BE IN IMPLEMENTING IT, AND SO THAT'S WHY IT WAS A NECCESARRY EVIL THAT WHEN GIVEN A CHOICE BETWEEN A DYING KID AND A THE ENTIRE TOWN'S SURVIVAL, IT MAKES SENSE THAT THE MAJORITY WOULD PICK THE TOWN, BECAUSE WITHOUT THE TOWN, THERE IS NOTHING FOR THE KID EITHER EVEN IF HE DOES SURVIVE. I'M NOT NIHILISTIC I'M COVERING THE BASES OF WHAT'S MOST LIKELY TO HAPPEN. YOU KEEP IMPLYING THAT THE FATHER SHOULD'VE BEEN FORGIVEN, WHEN WHAT HE DID WAS A CLEAR OFFENSE.
regardless, nah. i already explained myself in previous responses, so fill in the blanks or don’t. idc.
THEY DON'T NEED THE DOCTOR TO SURVIVE, THEY NEED THE MEDICINE. THEY FIND THE DOCTOR VALUABLE TO THE TOWN, THERE'S A DIFFERENCE. I CAN'T LIVE WITHOUT WATER, THAT'S A GIVEN, AND I FIND MY PHONE VALUABLE. DOES IT MEAN I CAN'T LIVE WITHOUT MY PHONE THE SAME WAY I CAN'T WITHOUT WATER? ABSOLUTELY NOT. BECAUSE AS I SAID, HE IS VALUABLE, HE HAS THE BETTER INSIGHT WHEN IT COMES TO HEALTH AND WELLNESS, THAN JUST READING OFF MEDICAL TEXTBOOKS, THEY TOOK HIM IN FOR THAT VERY REASON. BUT SHOULD IT LEADS TO A POINT WHEN THEY DO HAVE TO GET RID OF HIM, THEY WILL, BECAUSE HE ISN'T A NECESSITY, HE'S A GOOD ADDITION TO THE GROUP, BUT THEY CAN LIVE WITHOUT HIM, AND BEFOR HE CAME, THEY ALREADY DID LIVE WITHOUT HIM. DOCTOR VS MEDICINE, THE TOWN HAS A HIGHER CHANCE OF SURVIVING WITH THE MEDS IN THEIR RESOURCE THAN JUST HIM, MATTER OF FACT HE TAKES IN THE RESOURCE TOO, HE GETS FED, SHELTERED, AND SO ON.
no, this is dumb. i won’t explain why bc it’s clear why this is a dumb take.
LOL YOU KEEP INTERPRETING MY ANSWERS IN WAYS THAT YOU THINK WORKS FOR YOU. I SAID IT BEFORE AND I SAID IT AGAIN, THEY ARE MITIGATING TO AVOID GOING THROUGH EVEN WORSE CONDITIONS AND COURSE OF ACTIONS. CANNIBALISM IS ONLY POSSIBLE IF THEY ABSOLUTELY HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO EAT, AND THAT ONLY HAPPENS WHEN THEY HAVE NO OTHER RESOURCES TO GET TO. THESE ARE THE VERY SAME THINGS THAT THEY ARE STRICTLY KEEPING IN CHECK AS OF CURRENT, BECAUSE ONE SLIP AND THAT'S ALL IT TAKES TO GO THAT ROUTE.
ok.. well if it’s not clicking, then it is what it is chile.
MENTALLY AND ENVIRONMENTALLY, IT IS THE WORST CASE SCENARIO, YOU CANNOT GO FURTHER THAN HAVING THE MINDSET OF SURVIVING JUST FOR THE SAKE OF SURVIVAL, CANNOT HAVE A WORSE CASE SCENARIO THAN LIVING IN AN ENCLOSURE BECAUSE OTHERWISE YOU'LL GET KILLED BY FREAKING ZOMBIES. RAPE, CANNIBALISM, PEDOPHILIA, AND SLAVERY ARE THINGS THAT ARE BYPRODUCT OF THE ENVIRONMENT, WHICH GIVEN WHERE THEY ARE IS UNLIKELY. RAPE FOR INSTANCE IS MOSTLY DRIVEN BY THE DESIRE TO OVERPOWER ANOTHER PERSON, OR IN CASES OF INVASIONS, TO PROPAGATE THE POPULATION- THE SECOND I ALREADY SAID IS NOT HAPPENING IN THIS TOWN, AND THE FIRST ONE IS UNLIKELY TOO BECAUSE OVERPOWERING ANOTHER PERSON HAS NO BENEFIT TO THE TOWN EITHER, SO HOW WILL THE PERPETRATOR EVEN JUSTIFY IT. CANNIBALISM IS POSSIBLE DUE TO LACK OF FOOD, WHICH IS WHY THEY ARE EXTREMELY WARY OF THEIR RESOURCES, OTHERWISE, THIS IS WHAT'S NEXT ON THEIR PLATE. PEDOPHILIA, SIMILAR TO RAPE, IS JUST ANOTHER MEANS OF DESIRING FOR POWER, SPECIFICALLY TO CHILDREN, WHICH IN THIS TOWN BARELY EVEN HAS ANY, AND EVEN IF THERE IS AN ACTUAL PEDOPHILE, THAT WOULD MEAN THEY'D HARM THE KIDS, THERE'S NO JUSTIFICATION FOR THE TOWN TO LET IT PASS BECAUSE IT JUST MADE THE TOWN WORSE, SO RATHER THAN NORMALIZING IT, THEY WOULD ACTUALLY GET PUNISHED FOR IT. AND LASTLY SLAVERY, THIS ONE'S THE PRODUCT OF TAKING COMPLETE ADVANTAGE OF SOMEONE ELSE FOR YOUR OWN BENEFIT, HOW WOULD THIS APPLY TO THIS TOWN WHEN THEY NEED TO PERFORM CERTAIN ROLES THEMSELVES TO KEEP IT GOING? BEING A SLAVE MEANS YOU ARE WORKING BUT NOT GETTING COMPENSATED, IF IN THIS TOWN A WORKER IS NOT COMPENSATED WELL WITH THE NECASSARY RESOURCES LIKE FOOD AND SHELTER, THEN THEY'D JUST GROW WEAKER, WHICH BTW WOULD JUST MAKE THEM USELESS IN THE END, SO WHY WOULD THEY EVEN DO THAT?
ngl, i only read the first sentence. in this scenario, yes, what i mentioned is the worst case scenario. what they’re experiencing now is bad, but it’s not the worst.
BECAUSE THE PERSON NEEDED TO BE PUNISHED, THERE WAS NO OTHER WAY- YOU CAN'T EVEN COME UP WITH AN ALTERNATIVE YOURSELF, AND YET YOU INSIST THAT THERE IS ONE. OKAY, LAY IT DOWN THEN. YOU SAY IT AS IF THEY PULLED A RANDOM ASS NAME ON A LOTTERY BOX AND KILLED THE MAN SIMPLY BECAUSE HE WAS SELECTED, THERE WAS MOTIVE, AND THERE WAS JUSTIFICATION, IT WAS A SUBSTANTIATED ACTION.
nah.
EVER HEARD OF REAL LIFE? I SAID IT ALREADY, IT'S A FACTUAL THING THAT PEOPLE DO RESORT TO VIOLENT TENDENCIES WHEN FACED WITH EXTREME SITUATIONS, IT'S THERE FOR YOU TO READ AND WEEP ON. WALKING DEAD, ADMITTEDLY I HAVE NOT WATCHED, BUT CONSIDERING HOW YOU RAISED IT, I ASSUME IT ENDED WITH THE LEADS SURVIVING, WHICH OF COURSE THEY WOULD- IT'S A SHOW THAT SPANNED WHAT 8-10 SEASONS? PEOPLE ARE HEAVILY ATTACHED TO THESE CHARACTERS, YOU THINK THE PRODUCERS ARE GONNA KILL EM OFF? DEFO NOT A CHANCE, THOSE THING WOULD MOST INDEFINITELY FALL TO THE SIDE CHARACTERS INSTEAD.
ok, go watch it & then holler at me.
no, i’m implying that he's a leader & must set the tone by example.--OKAY SET THE TONE BY EXAMPLE AND THEN WHAT? WHAT EXACTLY DO YOU WANT HIM TO DO? HE'S THE LEADER BUT THE ROLE THAT THEY GAVE HIM WAS NOTHING MORE THAN AN EXECUTIONER- THE ENTIRE FREAKING SCENE EVEN WAS THEM GOING TO THE PUBLIC COURT, THE PERSON ANNOUNCED THAT THE RAT WAS FOUND, LAID OUT THE CRIME COMMITTED, LAID OUT THE PUNISHMENT FOR SAID CRIME, BROUGHT OUT THE CRIMINAL, AND THEN VOTED. OKAY SO AT WHICH POINT WOULD YOU HAVE HIM "LEAD BY EXAMPLE" THERE?
you don’t know why they didn’t. maybe it’s easier to have one person do it, maybe guwon’s strength is better utilized for it, etc. who knows? --LOL, KILLING IS KILLING THE END GOAL IS DEATH, HOW IS IT EASIER FOR ONE PERSON TO IT THAN MULTIPLE PEOPLE? IT'S EVEN MORE EFFICIENT WHEN IT'S DONE BY MANY.
you didn’t. you can only guess these things, but we can’t say 100% that this is their motive. so it’s only speculation until the story unfolds.--THAT PART OF THE STORY ALREADY UNFOLDED, THE PART WHERE THEY WENT AND DID IT ALREADY HAPPENED, THE MOTIVE THAT I PRESENTED MADE THE MOST SENSE BASED ON HOW THE PLOT IS LAID OUT SO FAR, HOW THE TOWNSFOLK ARE BEHAVING AND HOW REAL LIFE PEOPLE TEND TO DO IN THESE SITUATIONS. THE FACT ALONE THAT YOU CAN'T EVEN COME UP WITH A DIFFERENT MOTIVE FOR IT SAYS A LOT.
swinging in the other direction isn’t helpful either. balance is key. balance = ethics.=WHAT'S NOT GETTING TO YOU? THAT IS THEM FIGURING OUT THE RIGHT BALANCE- SCALING UP WHAT WORKS. THEY GIVE A LOOSE AND FRIENDLY APPROACH AND IT GETS ABUSED, THEY SET UP WARNINGS, IT DOESN'T WORK, THEY GIVE PENALTIES, THERE'S STILL INCIDENTS THAT GETS THROUGH, ON AND ON UNTIL THE PUNISHMENTS GETS STRICTER AND STRICTER TOWARDS WHAT'S MOST EXTREME. AND I KEEP OFFERING YOU TO GIVE YOUR LOGIC ON THIS TOO, IF THE LAW IS NOT WORKING BASED ON THEIR PREVIOUS PUNISHMENTS, MEANING THERE ARE STILL INSTANCES OF THEFT THAT HAPPENS BECAUSE IT'S ONLY A WARNING THAT'S GIVEN TO THE CRIMINAL, THEN WHAT ELSE COULD THEY HAVE DONE?
i did. go reread my responses or don’t. idc. nah, i don’t feel like it. go look for the list babe.--YOU DON'T EVEN LIKE REREADING YOUR OWN RESPONSE COZ THERE YOU'D FIND HOW MUCH YOU MESSED UP THINKING YOUR ARGUMENTS WERE SO SOLID, LMAO
we only know that she’s creeping around. jinwoo also lied but we don’t see him as a bad person, so i’m not going to jump to conclusions & say the vet is malicious. again, we don’t know these people yet or their motives besides survival, so your assumptions are speculation. everybody is hiding something. guwon threw up after kissing jinwoo, would i say he’s a bad person? no bc idk why he did it. i can only speculate. -AND AGAIN, WHY ON EARTH WOULD SHE BE CREEPING AROUND? IF SHE ISN'T DOING ANYTHING SHADY, WHY IS SHE ACTING SUS, SPECIFICALLY WHY DID THE AUTHOR MAKE HER APPEAR SO? ALSO I'M NOT SAYING THE VET IS MALICIOUS, I'M SAYING THE VET IS KEEPING A SECRET, ONE THAT'S ALREADY OUT AND OPEN IN THE PLOT- HE KEEPS ON THE FACADE THAT HE'S A DOCTOR BECAUSE IT'S WHAT THE TOWN FINDS VALUABLE, NOT A VET. IF HE WERE TO BE FOUND OUT, HE'LL BE SENT BACK OUTSIDE, THAT'S WHY HE'S ON EDGE. ALSO, THE MC DID NOT LIE, THE ML ONLY EVER ASKED HIM WHAT HE DOES, HE SAID HE'S A TEACHER BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT HE HAS EXPERIENCE IN (YES, EVEN IF YOU NEVER ACTUALLY WORKED PROFESSIONALLY, STUDYING TO BECOME ONE ALREADY COMES WITH THE EXPERIENCE BECAUSE THEY DO GO THROUGH MONTHS, IF NOT YEARS OF INTERNSHIP IN THE TEACHING FIELD), IT'S THE SAME THING WITH THE DOCTOR, HE PROBABLY JUST ASKED HIM WHAT HE DOES FOR A LIVING AND HE SAID HE'S A DOCTOR, BUT FAILED TO MENTION THAT HE'S A DOCTOR OF ANIMALS, NOT HUMANS. ALSO YA'LL KEEP PUSHING THAT THROW UP SCENE WHEN IT COULD'VE JUST BEEN SIMPLY BECAUSE HE'S INEXPERIENCED TO IT, EVEN THE MC HIMSELF SAID THAT HE THOUGHT ML DIDN'T LIKE KISSING HIM BECAUSE HE SEEMED UNCOMFORTABLE BEFORE, MEANING IT WAS NOT A SECRET SINCE HE DID NOTICE IT, THE ML WAS NOT ABLE TO HIDE IT FROM HIM, OR EVEN MADE AN EFFORT TO HIDE IT.
so the people who put him in a position of power don’t even want to talk to him? guwon can’t even look their way & say hello? that makes no sense. yeah, no. your argument falls flat here.-- LOL WHAT? I SAID THEY ARE TALKING CASUALLY TO HIM, LITERALLY SAID THERE THAT THEY APPROACH HIM EASILY AND TALKS TO HIM IN PUBLIC. YOU DON'T DO THAT TO SOMEONE YOU FIND SCARY. EVEN WHEN YOU'RE WITH ACQUIANTANCES, YOU WON'T APPROACH THEM EASILY REGARDLESS IF THEY ARE FRIENDLY OR NOT.
maybe it’s bc your english isn’t good? i never said you said that. I’M saying that it’s not effective long term. i’m agreeing with you, yes, but not fully by claiming it’s not a good strategy. i’m TELLING you that this point will be hard to reach due to your claim (violence first, empathy later). read things slowly next time.--LMAO YOU LITERALLY SAID THAT EXTREME MEASURES DOES NOT WORK "LONG TERM" AS A RESPONSE TO MY COUNTER PRIOR TO THAT, YOU MEANT THAT IN RESPONSE FOR WHAT I SAID. IF MY ENGLISH IS NOT GOOD, THEN THAT JUST PROVED HOW MUCH YOU LACK READING COMPREHENSION COZ THE MAIN IDEA IS STILL THERE. ALSO I POINTED THIS OUT ALREADY FROM THE VERY BEGINNING OF THE DISCUSSION- EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS IS CYCLICAL IN REALITY, AND IF THE AUTHOR IS PUSHING FOR IT TO BE REALISTIC, IT IS GOING TO BE THE SAME. THE VIOLENCE FIRST AND EMPATHY LATER THING IS NOT A MANDATE, IT'S A CAUSE AND EFFECT. THE REASON WHY PEOPLE EVENTUALLY GO ON AND HAVE GREAT EMPATHY FOR OTHERS IS BECAUSE OF THE VIOLENCE THAT THEY ENDURED, IF THEY NEVER GOT TO EXPERIENCE THAT, THEY NEVER WOULD'VE BEEN PUSHED TO DEVELOP IT TO THAT DEGREE. THIS IS WHY WE KEEP REMINDING YOUTHS OF THE CASUALTY OF WARS AND MOVEMENTS TO REMIND THEM OF THOSE VIOLENCE SO IT DOESN'T HAPPEN AGAIN AND WE CAN CONTINUE LIVING OUR COMFORTABLE LIFE. IN THIS WORK, THEY DO NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO REMINISCENT BACK TO, THEY ARE CURRENTLY WITHIN THE WAR, AND SO AS I SAID, THEY HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO GO THROUGH WITH THOSE MEANS FOR NOW.
well I’M saying that. idc that you didn’t say it. like i said, it’s not effective long term. period. take it or leave it.--AND? YOU SAY IT'S NOT EFFECTIVE LONG TERM OKAY, I AGREE BUT AGAIN, IT IS EFFECTIVE AS A TOOL FOR A DURATION OF TIME, WHICH YOU FAIL TO REALIZE.
regardless, nah. i already explained myself in previous responses, so fill in the blanks or don’t. idc.--YOU NEVER EXPLAINED ANYTHING, NEVER PROVIDED ANY PROOFS, NEVER GAVE ANY SOLID LOGIC AND ACTUAL PLANS BESIDE YOUR PERSONAL IDEOLOGIES, BULLSHITTER.
no, this is dumb. i won’t explain why bc it’s clear why this is a dumb take.-- YOU WON'T EXPLAIN BECAUSE YOU CAN'T COUNTER THE LOGIC BEHIND THAT AND YOU KNOW IT. JUST BECAUSE YOU CALL SOMETHING DUMB DOESN'T MAKE IT SO. IF I CALL YOU OUT ON YOUR BULLSHIT, I MAKE SURE YOU KNOW WHY I THINK IT'S BULLSHIT, YOU CALLING MY ARGUMENT DUMB WITHOUT BACKING IT UP IS JUST YOU TRYING TO CONSOLE YOURSELF
ok.. well if it’s not clicking, then it is what it is chile.--NOT CLICKING FOR YOU, CAUSE YOU WON'T ADMIT YOUR PREFERRED WAY OF HANDLING THESE CASES WOULD NEVER WORK.
ngl, i only read the first sentence. in this scenario, yes, what i mentioned is the worst case scenario. what they’re experiencing now is bad, but it’s not the worst.-LOL, AND YOU HAVE THE GUTS TO ARGUE, NOW WHO'S BIASED? YOU READ THE FIRST SENTENCE, IT DIDN'T AGREE WITH YOU, AND NOW YOU CONTINUE SPOUTING NONESENSE THAT EVEN AT THIS POINT, ARE GROUNDLESS TO A FAULT. YOU DARE COUNTER THAT FOR THEM TO BE CONSIDERED IN A "WORST CASE SCENARIO- IT HAS TO HAVE EITHER RAPE, CANNIBALISM, PEDOPHILIA, AND SLAVERY" AND I GAVE MY POINTS INDICATING HOW THESE THINGS ARE UNLIKELY TO HAPPEN IN THIS TOWN, WHICH IS WHY WHAT THEY ARE EXPERIENCING NOW IS ALREADY THE WORST, THE NEXT WORST THING FOR THEM IS DEATH, AND THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE TRYING TO SURVIVE AGAINST.
nah.--TYPICAL RESPONSE OF A CORNERED BRAT WHO COULDN'T SUPPORT THEIR OWN STANCE, THINKING THEY ATE WITH A SHORT REPONSE INSTEAD. GO WATCH YOUR MORNING TOONS, KID LMAOOOO
ok, go watch it & then holler at me.--WHY SHOULD I WASTE TIME AND DO THAT? EVEN SOME RESPONSES FROM THIS THREAD AGREES THAT WHAT THE ML DID MADE SENSE BASING OFF WALKING DEAD ITSELF, IT'S YOUR HEAD THAT'S IN A FANTASYLAND, THINKING THINGS WOULD BE SOLVED BY RAINBOWS AND SPRINKLES.
OKAY SET THE TONE BY EXAMPLE AND THEN WHAT? WHAT EXACTLY DO YOU WANT HIM TO DO? HE'S THE LEADER BUT THE ROLE THAT THEY GAVE HIM WAS NOTHING MORE THAN AN EXECUTIONER- THE ENTIRE FREAKING SCENE EVEN WAS THEM GOING TO THE PUBLIC COURT, THE PERSON ANNOUNCED THAT THE RAT WAS FOUND, LAID OUT THE CRIME COMMITTED, LAID OUT THE PUNISHMENT FOR SAID CRIME, BROUGHT OUT THE CRIMINAL, AND THEN VOTED. OKAY SO AT WHICH POINT WOULD YOU HAVE HIM "LEAD BY EXAMPLE" THERE?
already explained it. ┗( T﹏T )┛
LOL, KILLING IS KILLING THE END GOAL IS DEATH, HOW IS IT EASIER FOR ONE PERSON TO IT THAN MULTIPLE PEOPLE? IT'S EVEN MORE EFFICIENT WHEN IT'S DONE BY MANY.
idk. like i said, we don’t know why. ヽ(`Д´)ﾉ
THAT PART OF THE STORY ALREADY UNFOLDED, THE PART WHERE THEY WENT AND DID IT ALREADY HAPPENED, THE MOTIVE THAT I PRESENTED MADE THE MOST SENSE BASED ON HOW THE PLOT IS LAID OUT SO FAR, HOW THE TOWNSFOLK ARE BEHAVING AND HOW REAL LIFE PEOPLE TEND TO DO IN THESE SITUATIONS. THE FACT ALONE THAT YOU CAN'T EVEN COME UP WITH A DIFFERENT MOTIVE FOR IT SAYS A LOT.
refresh my memory. (▰˘◡˘▰)
WHAT'S NOT GETTING TO YOU? THAT IS THEM FIGURING OUT THE RIGHT BALANCE- SCALING UP WHAT WORKS. THEY GIVE A LOOSE AND FRIENDLY APPROACH AND IT GETS ABUSED, THEY SET UP WARNINGS, IT DOESN'T WORK, THEY GIVE PENALTIES, THERE'S STILL INCIDENTS THAT GETS THROUGH, ON AND ON UNTIL THE PUNISHMENTS GETS STRICTER AND STRICTER TOWARDS WHAT'S MOST EXTREME. AND I KEEP OFFERING YOU TO GIVE YOUR LOGIC ON THIS TOO, IF THE LAW IS NOT WORKING BASED ON THEIR PREVIOUS PUNISHMENTS, MEANING THERE ARE STILL INSTANCES OF THEFT THAT HAPPENS BECAUSE IT'S ONLY A WARNING THAT'S GIVEN TO THE CRIMINAL, THEN WHAT ELSE COULD THEY HAVE DONE?
re-read previous responses, then holler back at me. ლ(´ڡ`ლ)
YOU DON'T EVEN LIKE REREADING YOUR OWN RESPONSE COZ THERE YOU'D FIND HOW MUCH YOU MESSED UP THINKING YOUR ARGUMENTS WERE SO SOLID, LMAO
sure.. refresh my memory then. ٩(๑❛ᴗ❛๑)۶
AND AGAIN, WHY ON EARTH WOULD SHE BE CREEPING AROUND? IF SHE ISN'T DOING ANYTHING SHADY, WHY IS SHE ACTING SUS, SPECIFICALLY WHY DID THE AUTHOR MAKE HER APPEAR SO? ALSO I'M NOT SAYING THE VET IS MALICIOUS, I'M SAYING THE VET IS KEEPING A SECRET, ONE THAT'S ALREADY OUT AND OPEN IN THE PLOT- HE KEEPS ON THE FACADE THAT HE'S A DOCTOR BECAUSE IT'S WHAT THE TOWN FINDS VALUABLE, NOT A VET. IF HE WERE TO BE FOUND OUT, HE'LL BE SENT BACK OUTSIDE, THAT'S WHY HE'S ON EDGE. ALSO, THE MC DID NOT LIE, THE ML ONLY EVER ASKED HIM WHAT HE DOES, HE SAID HE'S A TEACHER BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT HE HAS EXPERIENCE IN (YES, EVEN IF YOU NEVER ACTUALLY WORKED PROFESSIONALLY, STUDYING TO BECOME ONE ALREADY COMES WITH THE EXPERIENCE BECAUSE THEY DO GO THROUGH MONTHS, IF NOT YEARS OF INTERNSHIP IN THE TEACHING FIELD), IT'S THE SAME THING WITH THE DOCTOR, HE PROBABLY JUST ASKED HIM WHAT HE DOES FOR A LIVING AND HE SAID HE'S A DOCTOR, BUT FAILED TO MENTION THAT HE'S A DOCTOR OF ANIMALS, NOT HUMANS. ALSO YA'LL KEEP PUSHING THAT THROW UP SCENE WHEN IT COULD'VE JUST BEEN SIMPLY BECAUSE HE'S INEXPERIENCED TO IT, EVEN THE MC HIMSELF SAID THAT HE THOUGHT ML DIDN'T LIKE KISSING HIM BECAUSE HE SEEMED UNCOMFORTABLE BEFORE, MEANING IT WAS NOT A SECRET SINCE HE DID NOTICE IT, THE ML WAS NOT ABLE TO HIDE IT FROM HIM, OR EVEN MADE AN EFFORT TO HIDE IT.
we don’t know. a lie is a lie. you just made that up. (●￣(ｴ)￣●)
LOL WHAT? I SAID THEY ARE TALKING CASUALLY TO HIM, LITERALLY SAID THERE THAT THEY APPROACH HIM EASILY AND TALKS TO HIM IN PUBLIC. YOU DON'T DO THAT TO SOMEONE YOU FIND SCARY. EVEN WHEN YOU'RE WITH ACQUIANTANCES, YOU WON'T APPROACH THEM EASILY REGARDLESS IF THEY ARE FRIENDLY OR NOT.
nah. ┑(￣Д ￣)┍
LMAO YOU LITERALLY SAID THAT EXTREME MEASURES DOES NOT WORK "LONG TERM" AS A RESPONSE TO MY COUNTER PRIOR TO THAT, YOU MEANT THAT IN RESPONSE FOR WHAT I SAID. IF MY ENGLISH IS NOT GOOD, THEN THAT JUST PROVED HOW MUCH YOU LACK READING COMPREHENSION COZ THE MAIN IDEA IS STILL THERE. ALSO I POINTED THIS OUT ALREADY FROM THE VERY BEGINNING OF THE DISCUSSION- EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS IS CYCLICAL IN REALITY, AND IF THE AUTHOR IS PUSHING FOR IT TO BE REALISTIC, IT IS GOING TO BE THE SAME. THE VIOLENCE FIRST AND EMPATHY LATER THING IS NOT A MANDATE, IT'S A CAUSE AND EFFECT. THE REASON WHY PEOPLE EVENTUALLY GO ON AND HAVE GREAT EMPATHY FOR OTHERS IS BECAUSE OF THE VIOLENCE THAT THEY ENDURED, IF THEY NEVER GOT TO EXPERIENCE THAT, THEY NEVER WOULD'VE BEEN PUSHED TO DEVELOP IT TO THAT DEGREE. THIS IS WHY WE KEEP REMINDING YOUTHS OF THE CASUALTY OF WARS AND MOVEMENTS TO REMIND THEM OF THOSE VIOLENCE SO IT DOESN'T HAPPEN AGAIN AND WE CAN CONTINUE LIVING OUR COMFORTABLE LIFE. IN THIS WORK, THEY DO NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO REMINISCENT BACK TO, THEY ARE CURRENTLY WITHIN THE WAR, AND SO AS I SAID, THEY HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO GO THROUGH WITH THOSE MEANS FOR NOW.
idk, man. refresh my memory. (〜￣△￣)〜
AND? YOU SAY IT'S NOT EFFECTIVE LONG TERM OKAY, I AGREE BUT AGAIN, IT IS EFFECTIVE AS A TOOL FOR A DURATION OF TIME, WHICH YOU FAIL TO REALIZE.
nah, it’s not.（￣へ￣）
YOU NEVER EXPLAINED ANYTHING, NEVER PROVIDED ANY PROOFS, NEVER GAVE ANY SOLID LOGIC AND ACTUAL PLANS BESIDE YOUR PERSONAL IDEOLOGIES, BULLSHITTER.
explain it again; i forgot. (￣∇￣")
YOU WON'T EXPLAIN BECAUSE YOU CAN'T COUNTER THE LOGIC BEHIND THAT AND YOU KNOW IT. JUST BECAUSE YOU CALL SOMETHING DUMB DOESN'T MAKE IT SO. IF I CALL YOU OUT ON YOUR BULLSHIT, I MAKE SURE YOU KNOW WHY I THINK IT'S BULLSHIT, YOU CALLING MY ARGUMENT DUMB WITHOUT BACKING IT UP IS JUST YOU TRYING TO CONSOLE YOURSELF
sure. i mean, you can refresh my memory & explain it again. (￣∇￣")
NOT CLICKING FOR YOU, CAUSE YOU WON'T ADMIT YOUR PREFERRED WAY OF HANDLING THESE CASES WOULD NEVER WORK.
click clack. (〜￣△￣)〜
. LOL, AND YOU HAVE THE GUTS TO ARGUE, NOW WHO'S BIASED? YOU READ THE FIRST SENTENCE, IT DIDN'T AGREE WITH YOU, AND NOW YOU CONTINUE SPOUTING NONESENSE THAT EVEN AT THIS POINT, ARE GROUNDLESS TO A FAULT. YOU DARE COUNTER THAT FOR THEM TO BE CONSIDERED IN A "WORST CASE SCENARIO- IT HAS TO HAVE EITHER RAPE, CANNIBALISM, PEDOPHILIA, AND SLAVERY" AND I GAVE MY POINTS INDICATING HOW THESE THINGS ARE UNLIKELY TO HAPPEN IN THIS TOWN, WHICH IS WHY WHAT THEY ARE EXPERIENCING NOW IS ALREADY THE WORST, THE NEXT WORST THING FOR THEM IS DEATH, AND THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE TRYING TO SURVIVE AGAINST.
it was too long. summarize it for me babe. (⊙…⊙ )
TYPICAL RESPONSE OF A CORNERED BRAT WHO COULDN'T SUPPORT THEIR OWN STANCE, THINKING THEY ATE WITH A SHORT REPONSE INSTEAD. GO WATCH YOUR MORNING TOONS, KID LMAOOOO
pull me out the corner then. i don’t bite. (づ￣ ³￣)づ
WHY SHOULD I WASTE TIME AND DO THAT? EVEN SOME RESPONSES FROM THIS THREAD AGREES THAT WHAT THE ML DID MADE SENSE BASING OFF WALKING DEAD ITSELF, IT'S YOUR HEAD THAT'S IN A FANTASYLAND, THINKING THINGS WOULD BE SOLVED BY RAINBOWS AND SPRINKLES.
insight. (=・ω・=)
already explained it. ┗( T﹏T )┛-- NO YOU DID NOT, KEEP TELLING YOURSELF THAT IF IT MAKES YOU FEEL BETTER
idk. like i said, we don’t know why. ヽ(`Д´)ﾉ- LMAO, IT'S YOU WHO DON'T KNOW WHY, BECAUSE YOU CHOOSE TO BELIEVE I WITH YOUR FAULTY REASONINGS
refresh my memory. (▰˘◡˘▰)- YOU CLEARLY WENT AND SKIMMED IT YOURSELF, JUST A FEW RESPONSE EARLIER, YOU EVEN GAVE SPECIFIC PAGE NUMBERS THAT HILARIOUSLY JUST DUMBED DOWN YOUR OWN ARGUMENT.
re-read previous responses, then holler back at me. ლ(´ڡ`ლ)- ALREADY DID THAT'S WHY I'M SAYING WHAT I SAID.
sure.. refresh my memory then. ٩(๑❛ᴗ❛๑)۶- WHY SHOULD I? IT'S YOU WHO WROTE IT.
we don’t know. a lie is a lie. you just made that up. (●￣(ｴ)￣●)- I ALREADY GAVE PROOF HOW BOTH OF THEM WEREN'T TECHNICALLY LYING, AND HOW WAS THAT ME MAKING IT UP WHEN IT WAS LITERALLY IN THE WORK?
nah. ┑(￣Д ￣)┍ --LOL, YOU SHOULD'VE RESPONDED THIS WAY FROM THE VERY BEGINNING, THE FACT THAT YOU'RE JUST DOING THAT NOW WHEN YOU ALREADY HAD A LONG-ASS ARGUMENT WITH ME TRYING TO PROVE YOUR POINT JUST SHOWS YOU WEREN'T ABLE TO SUSTAIN WHAT YOU BELIEVED IN WHEN COUNTERED ACCORDINGLY
idk, man. refresh my memory. (〜￣△￣)〜- AGAIN, NOT MY JOB, YOU WROTE IT, IT'S THERE FOR YOU TO LOOK BACK TO.
nah, it’s not.（￣へ￣）-YOU CALLED ME OUT SAYING MY ANSWERS WERE BASED OFF MY OWN PERSONAL PREFERENCE, WHO'S RESPONDING BASED ON THEIR PERSONAL PREFERENCE NOW COZ THEY HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO SAY
explain it again; i forgot. (￣∇￣")- HOW CAN I EXPLAIN SOMETHING YOU NEVER EVEN GAVE, DIMWIT
sure. i mean, you can refresh my memory & explain it again. (￣∇￣") - AGAIN, HOW CAN I EXPLAIN SOMETHING AND SUMMARIZE THE DISCUSSION WHEN YOU NEVER GAVE ANYTHING ON YOUR SIDE ASIDE FROM YOUR PERSONAL IDEALS, IT WAS ONLY ME DOING EXPLAINING HERE, GO DO IT YOURSELF.
it was too long. summarize it for me babe. (⊙…⊙ )-JUST SAY YOU DIDN'T EVEN READ IT COZ YOU KNOW IT DOESN'T AGREE WITH WHAT YOU WANT, AND YOU CAN'T ANSWER GENUINELY EITHER COZ YOU CLEALY CAN'T SUPPORT YOUR OWN ARGUMENTS LOL
insight. (=・ω・=)--BECAUSE DUH? OF COURSE IT'S INSIGHT, IT'S COMPARING TWO WORKS TOGETHER.
NO YOU DID NOT, KEEP TELLING YOURSELF THAT IF IT MAKES YOU FEEL BETTER
break it down for me then sis. help a sista out ┗( T﹏T )┛
LMAO, IT'S YOU WHO DON'T KNOW WHY, BECAUSE YOU CHOOSE TO BELIEVE I WITH YOUR FAULTY REASONINGS
wat dat mean Σ( ￣□￣||)
YOU CLEARLY WENT AND SKIMMED IT YOURSELF, JUST A FEW RESPONSE EARLIER, YOU EVEN GAVE SPECIFIC PAGE NUMBERS THAT HILARIOUSLY JUST DUMBED DOWN YOUR OWN ARGUMENT.
what did i skim? (⊙…⊙ )
ALREADY DID THAT'S WHY I'M SAYING WHAT I SAID.
what did you said? (⊙…⊙ )
WHY SHOULD I? IT'S YOU WHO WROTE IT.
what did i write?!!!?!!! i’m confusion.┗( T﹏T )┛
I ALREADY GAVE PROOF HOW BOTH OF THEM WEREN'T TECHNICALLY LYING, AND HOW WAS THAT ME MAKING IT UP WHEN IT WAS LITERALLY IN THE WORK?
oh, word? who wasn’t lying? what’s in the work? (⊙…⊙ )
LOL, YOU SHOULD'VE RESPONDED THIS WAY FROM THE VERY BEGINNING, THE FACT THAT YOU'RE JUST DOING THAT NOW WHEN YOU ALREADY HAD A LONG-ASS ARGUMENT WITH ME TRYING TO PROVE YOUR POINT JUST SHOWS YOU WEREN'T ABLE TO SUSTAIN WHAT YOU BELIEVED IN WHEN COUNTERED ACCORDINGLY
i gave you my responses already. i don’t need to rewrite them. (⌒▽⌒)
AGAIN, NOT MY JOB, YOU WROTE IT, IT'S THERE FOR YOU TO LOOK BACK TO.
write what? look back to what? (⊙…⊙ )
YOU CALLED ME OUT SAYING MY ANSWERS WERE BASED OFF MY OWN PERSONAL PREFERENCE, WHO'S RESPONDING BASED ON THEIR PERSONAL PREFERENCE NOW COZ THEY HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO SAY
well, what did you say for me to say that? (〜￣△￣)〜
HOW CAN I EXPLAIN SOMETHING YOU NEVER EVEN GAVE, DIMWIT
i thought we were partners? comrades? amigos? Σ(っ°Д °;)っ
AGAIN, HOW CAN I EXPLAIN SOMETHING AND SUMMARIZE THE DISCUSSION WHEN YOU NEVER GAVE ANYTHING ON YOUR SIDE ASIDE FROM YOUR PERSONAL IDEALS, IT WAS ONLY ME DOING EXPLAINING HERE, GO DO IT YOURSELF.
what did i never give my side on? (=・ω・=)
JUST SAY YOU DIDN'T EVEN READ IT COZ YOU KNOW IT DOESN'T AGREE WITH WHAT YOU WANT, AND YOU CAN'T ANSWER GENUINELY EITHER COZ YOU CLEALY CAN'T SUPPORT YOUR OWN ARGUMENTS LOL
well, is that the summary of what you said? (⊙…⊙ )
BECAUSE DUH? OF COURSE IT'S INSIGHT, IT'S COMPARING TWO WORKS TOGETHER.
no sense baby. ╮(￣▽￣)╭
i gave you my responses already. i don’t need to rewrite them. (⌒▽⌒)-- I DIDN'T ASK YOU TO REWRITE THEM, I ASKED WHICH POINTS BACKED UP YOUR ARGUMENT, WHICH OF COURSE, NONE.
NEXT TIME YOU ACT OUT TRYING TO BE CONFIDENT WITH WHATEVER BS YOU BELIEVE IN, MAKE SURE TO BACK IT UP BEFORE SHRINKING INTO A PETTY AUTO-SPIEL TRYING TO PLAY IT COOL. I WAS IN THIS FOR THE DISCUSSION, GENUINELY HOPING THAT YOU'LL GIVE ACTUAL COUNTERPOINTS THAT WOULD ALSO MAKE ME QUESTION MY OWN ARGUMENTS, BUT NAH FOLKS LIKE YOU RESORT TO THE SAME THING- ALL YA SHOUT ARE NOTHING BUT IDEOLOGIES WITH NO GROUND TO STAND ON LMAOOOO
I DIDN'T ASK YOU TO REWRITE THEM, I ASKED WHICH POINTS BACKED UP YOUR ARGUMENT, WHICH OF COURSE, NONE.
NEXT TIME YOU ACT OUT TRYING TO BE CONFIDENT WITH WHATEVER BS YOU BELIEVE IN, MAKE SURE TO BACK IT UP BEFORE SHRINKING INTO A PETTY AUTO-SPIEL TRYING TO PLAY IT COOL. I WAS IN THIS FOR THE DISCUSSION, GENUINELY HOPING THAT YOU'LL GIVE ACTUAL COUNTERPOINTS THAT WOULD ALSO MAKE ME QUESTION MY OWN ARGUMENTS, BUT NAH FOLKS LIKE YOU RESORT TO THE SAME THING- ALL YA SHOUT ARE NOTHING BUT IDEOLOGIES WITH NO GROUND TO STAND ON LMAOOOO
summarize this pls.
also, you never gave good arguments. if you what you thought was true, doubt would’ve never crossed your mind. you reneged on the same spiel over & over, asking for things that are already there. it was subpar at best. i honestly doubt if you’re aware enough to understand the words i’m saying. i thought it would be best for me to condense my words down in a way that would be enjoyable for you. your doubt tells me everything i need to know lol.
renege isn’t a good word. more like harped… yeah harp is more like it.
maybe better luck next time? you snooze you lose? move your feet, lose your seat? lol.
what do you think will happen next chapter? maybe guwon cries bc the villagers are using him. no, wait… maybe the vet uses jinwoo to trick guwon. nono… maybe the father’s kid starts an uprising? that last one is a good one. i like the sound of that.
or… jinwoo wakes up & it was all a dream. none of this is real. oooo… spooky.
and I have asked throughout this discussion, where does your argument go into? where is the logic in that? where is your proof? na-da, all you keep saying is that my arguments are not good, or that you already gave your reasoning (which tbf, you did but as nothing more than your own personal beliefs) you never pointed addressed the main point of your side of the argument, never gave it actual substance, and now you say you were just trying to condense your words when clearly you were attempting to troll coz you can't reason no more, please bitch, try harder. LOL
who’s your favorite character? mine is the vet. the way he uses guwon is *chef’s kiss*. stanning scary characters in survival plots is everything. my money is on him.
now that i think about it, this kind is reminds of the walking dead. maybe the author took inspiration from the show? that’d be cool.
i think they’ll release the next chapter the first week of june. it’s gonna be so crazy. the comment section is gonna go wild.
maybe jinwoo will turn the village against him?
i wonder how many pages a topic can have?
i’ve always wanted to know why this is considered a topic & not a comment. #QTNA
Being moral is good and all, but when you are living in a dying world with resources that runs up quicker than you can say kumbayah, only the ruthless makes it to the end. Every hero is seen as a genocidal maniac from those that they've overpowered, even in modern times, a lot of those with psychopathic/sociopathic tendencies achieve greatness in life.
I find this development to be a good one, instead of making the ML a flat, strong but sensitive type of generic lead, author actually gave him backbones that make sense to his character profile- he's the leader of a dystopian group, for goodness sake, when everything is messed up and scarce, people do tend to go to the extremes just to survive, also what was he supposed to do? if he spared him at the last minute, that would be showing favor which would 1. decrease loyalty from his followers who tried their best to adhere to the laws themselves, 2. create animosity for the spared "criminal" from the other townsfolk (because why was he spared and not the others?) and 3. show weakness to the leader - if he can do it once for someone, then others could just pull a sob story and use it to justify going against the law.
Everything's cyclical anyway, once this extremity reaches a boiling point it is bound to pop. Maybe the kid will take revenge, maybe the MC will lead a rebellion against the ML, maybe they both lose their minds in the end. This story can go multiple ways and I find that's what makes it really interesting so far.