
You said that, not me. Sleeping and dead drunk are hard no's because they cannot literally consent - they are more dead than a fish.
He ghosted because he was damn ashamed. He was dumb, if it isn't obvious and he knew he was dumb. But he was very much a willing participant, from the moment he agreed to talk in his apartment.

Tf is wrong with you? People can change their mind at any point and decide they do not want to do something… doing it anyway is assault. When they’re intoxicated or semi- or fully unconscious they cannot say anything… doing it anyway is assault. If someone is not an enthusiastic participant at any point or says “no” (and any fucking derivative of that full sentence) at any point (even if they said yes before) IT MEANS NO CONSENT. FFS why do people not know this stuff

Yes, technically you’re correct. It could still be considered sexual assault if someone says “no” and the other party ignores it and continues. Even if the MC’s actions seem contradictory, what matters most is whether freely given consent is present. In real-life situations and many legal systems, “no” means no, regardless of body language or mixed signals.
But we all can see MC’s enjoying every second of it.
You must be fun at parties I assume.

So many points where he could have said no. The moment he was taken to the bed, ML's hands creeping it's way to his waist, to his skin. His fingers going to unbutton his pants. He never shoved him. Its no different from denying you took illegal drugs, knowing it's illegal but since you didn't buy it, it was only given to you, you deny any fault for consuming it.
atleast hes askijg sooyoung for permission.. sometimes