
And this is irrelevant. In a court case — with a victim and an abuser — the question is not whether the individual was cautious. That has little to no bearing. The only question that matters is: Did X rape Y? Not: Did Y protect themselves well enough? The law doesn’t waste time with logically inconclusive or morally empty questions. It is a criminal offense.
1) It is all about Consent and Capacity.
2) Victim’s “Precautions” Are Legally Irrelevant.
3) Stupid questions like “Did the victim protect themselves enough?” is a red herring and shifts blame from the abuser to the abused.
If you still can’t respond without committing even one fallacy, then seriously go educate yourself first. Don't talk back to me until you are able to display proper understanding of the subject—rhetoric grounded on reality, laws, morals and at least basic logic.
Instead of yapping here, you’d be better off watching a 15-minute educational video on the subject. Yikes.
atleast hes askijg sooyoung for permission.. sometimes