
GIRL WBAT
This argument falls apart the second you realize that people do criticize media for glorifying violence, ever heard of school shooting debates or anti-violent game campaigns??????But here's the difference sight? murder and gun violence aren’t sexualized or fetishized the way rape is in those comics these PPL r defending. No one’s getting off to mass shootings in GTA, but these stories literally turn abuse into erotica dawg, If you can’t see the issue with that distinction, then you’re either being willfully dense or you’re too far gone in your own justifications

Critique and telling an author to die is something else. Also all of these anti violent game campaigns have been disproven since video games don't cause violence, neither does reading rape books cause you to be a rapist.
So you only have a problem with sexual stuff? That seems like you play down people of shooting to uphold the people of sexual abuse. Both are equally as bad. Fetishizing or not because in the end both of these are "glamorized". Are you actually listening to yourself? Comparing two immoral things while saying that one is worse because I simply say so? Both are equally horrible things to go through

No one said critique equals death threats, that’s a bad-faith stretch. And no, it’s not just about "sexual stuff" cuz the issue is the fetishization of real trauma. You don’t see people masturbating to school shootings in the media the way some do to rape scenes here, Jax and that Yashiki girl literally said something about how the raped up expressions of the bottom in the "reverse thinking" is making them feel 'tHingS' like what
And Comparing the existence of violence in fiction to the eroticization of sexual violence isn’t the mic drop you think it is, they are not treated or consumed the same way, and pretending otherwise is js dishonest

Funny how you claim to care about victims, yet you're defending media that fetishizes the exact trauma survivors live with. No one is equating victims to fictional characters, it’s rape fetishizers who routinely belittle real survivors by treating their trauma like a kink or a coping excuse. If anything, consuming that content casually does more to downplay real abuse than any critique ever could :|||

No one is denying that some survivors use fiction or art in their healing, but that doesn't excuse or justify fetishizing rape or promoting it as entertainment. There's a massive difference between therapeutic exploration of trauma and glorifying abuse for pleasure. If the material is being defended not as healing but as a kink, then it stops being about recovery and starts being about normalization and that's where the real issue lies
so i am confused with what your aim is here

Both involve deriving pleasure from extreme human suffering. If getting off to mass murder would be seen as abhorrent (and it is), then it’s just as disturbing to treat sexual violence as titillating entertainment. The medium might be different, but the moral disconnect is the same
I genuinely don't get your point in commenting here, are y ou comnplaining that I am exposing these freaks?

People fetishize real trauma everyday. Abuse, bdsm and so on.
People have had rape kinks for centuries. Why do we have cnc? The fact is that the roleplay is hot for some people. Real rape isn't for the majority of these people.
But again you have no rebuttal for this. Immoral Fiction has never caused violence, solely. They both done for enjoyment. There is no change in jerking off and enjoying something. Both end up with you consuming immoral media

I care about victims. You are belittling rape victims / sexual assault victims. Did you know that the majority of women have rape fantasies? Which is most likely caused by sexual assault? Trauma's often turn into kinks. Consuming the media directed at your kink doesn't down play it. Never has, never will since we would see more women raping men. The reason why rape is so downplayed is because of media, not fiction.
BEWARE OF THESE RAP ENABLERS, who do nothing but gang up on people who call out their disgusting asses
1) Jax
2) Yashiki
3) Kabukichuo
4) smutGODDESS
What’s truly unsettling isn’t just the content being defended, but it’s the mental gymnastics these creeps perform to excuse it. You defended repeated depictions of rape in fiction, sexualized abuse, joked about collars and domination, and then suddenly acted concerned about morality the moment someone pointed it out not because you care, but because it threatened your comfort, ARE YOU A CLOWN?
I’m 17, and instead of engaging with my criticism in good faith, you tried to discredit me based on age as if that invalidates basic empathy and awareness. It’s telling that your concern for minors only kicked in when it became a convenient way to deflect accountability. You weren’t concerned when making EXPLICIT DISGUSTING JOKES in public comment sections, or when ROMANTICIZING RAPE SHIT. You only cared when someone younger than you said 'This isn’t okay'
Then came the predictable fallback: 'It’s just fiction.' That argument has limit, AND YOU ARE DUKB FOR USING IT. it literaly reflects what creators choose to portray and what audiences choose to celebrate. When rape is used repeatedly as entertainment, dressed up with pretty art or passed off as a romantic arc, it’s not just fiction. It’s normalization. And calling that out is not moral panic, it’s necessary media critique
What you call 'hypocrisy' or 'illiteracy' is actually just someone unwilling to make excuses for harmful patterns. I’m not here to silence dark content, I’m here to question why so many people defend it so aggressively, and why discomfort only seems to arise when it’s being critiqued, not consumed. If that unsettles you, maybe you should be asking why not silencing the person who noticed
The audacity of these rape enablers to call me having 0 literacy for calling out their disgusting acts