
It's fine if you don't care anymore but I am putting myself in his shoes. I said before that removing any neurotypicalness from the equation it still remains the same.
I know for a fact that I would completely and totally hate it if someone did that to me. I have home directly to the internet and I have seen that the definition of harassment is 'behaviour that annoys or upsets someone', read that and tell me Red is not harassing Sangwoo. I don't think you REALLY read my argument before replying.

Okay so now I understand your point of view. So this is how you see it, because I thought you talked about "bullying", which is something like "seek to harm, intimidate, or coerce (someone perceived as vulnerable)" and it's not the case here. I mean it's sure is annoying but taking someone usual seat or brand coffee is harmless and not intimidating. But if we're talking about "behavior that annoy or upset someone" then now, we can agree lmao ! (≧∀≦)

I know i wasn't actually a part of you guys' discussion, but you shouldn't feel bad or annoying for being passionate and fighting for your opinion! misunderstandings happen, especially here since english is just a second(/3rd/etc) language for a lot of people. I think it speaks very well for you that you are able to admit that there was a misunderstanding.
Also, you actually do seem like a nice person imo, so really, don't worry about it too much (●'◡'●)ノ

Sir, are you always this dense or is today a special occasion?
If he's doing this to trigger Sangwoo on purpose, it's because he knows it's gonna bother Sangwoo. That's the very definition of harassment.
I think you're not thinking objectively on this matter, because you're so set on defending your point of view that you'll see whatever you want to see, even if your arguments are contradictory.
You know what else is contradictory? Saying you'll no longer will fight on the internet and then keep on fighting on the internet.

OK so firstly, as you can see, I never felt like I was "loosing" the argument, I still believe that I'm not wrong and stated why. Secondly, you talk about harassment while I talk about bullying, those things are not the same, so the debate was biased anyway.
Also, you believe that he realized that he may be "neuro divergent" while I believe he did not realized it, (because it may be obvious for the readers but it's not necessarily the case for him since he doesn't know his point of view). And on this matter, there is no real truth since it's just presumptions.
That's funny because you're accusing me of something I accuse you of doing. So we are either both wrong or right.
And to conclude, I didn't want to fight with you but I don't have any problems talking or debating with others, they look nice. I don't mind having a debate but it's useless if you don't read what I'm writing or if I simply feel like it's going to nowhere.

I read what you are writing, I just think it's wrong.
Go back into your own comments and realise that you were the one who went as low as to try to discredit me first when you stated that I might have been bullied and therefore my opinion is biased and shouldn't hold credit.
The bottom line is that, whether Sangwoo is NA or not and whether Jaeyoung knew or mot is merely an aggravating clause in the subject, as Jaeyoung is purposefully doing things to bother him.
That's an asshole move, whether someone is NA or not. Even if Sangwoo is NT, Jaeyoung is doing things that he knows will bother him, with the very purpose of bothering him and messing up his life.
Call it whatever you want - bullying, harassment, whatever. But don't try to say what Jaeyoung is doing is harmless and just childish behavior, cuz we are clearly seeing it isn't harmless, regardless of what you think Jaeyoung's intentions are.
(Spoilers: his intention is not to play a harmless prank on Sangwoo).

I don't even understand why we're having this debate because we're basically saying the same things. Are you sure you're reading what I writing ? I'm saying that he's bothering on purpose and that it is childish and this is literally what you're telling me as if I was saying the contrary. I'm still convinced that your point of view is biased by your own past tho. The difference between our 2 point of views is that I don't condone his actions as much as you, I just think he's stupid and immature while you're saying he is the biggest asshole of the universe for bullying someone. And there is a difference between bullying and harassment, and I think that this difference is important, but apparently you don't and you think it's the same thing. And I'll keep thinking that he's behavior is harmless, it may be annoying but it's not that serious or that deep. Sincerely, I feel like we're going nowhere.
Okay, now he's getting on my nerves. He is still a student, he needs to be able to learn properly. I really don't like this guy, this is just annoying and disruptive. Poor Sangwoo.