The age of consent is 13. Having sex with a minor can only result in charges of statutory rape if the minor claims it was rape and proof can't be given that it was consensual. Yes, a 13 y. o. can decide to have sex with an adult of their own accord.
Here: https://www.reddit.com/r/korea/comments/51fb40/what_is_really_the_age_of_consent_here_in_korea/
There is both a link to a case there and a Seoul university student studying this very topic that describes the clauses very well.
Was that dick pic to Seungtaek from when he was younger or was it while he was in high school by American terms? Also, this chapter doesn't really change anything all of us were saying, none of us were arguing that he wasn't a predator in the past or that it's okay. We were discussing his interactions with Seunghee specifically. Yes, he's been disgusting in the past, we all kinda knew that. What we need to know now is whether or not he's preying on Seunghee or not. I mean, now it probably doesn't matter since it looks like Seunghee might not be interested in him anymore. What everyone was arguing is that, in the scenario in which Blondie actually fell for Seunghee and wasn't preying on him, it's just that he fell in love with a younger guy. If their love was portrayed as pure and innocent, it wouldn't matter. If he properly took care of Seunghee and Seunghee loved him back. This scenario might have been good for him, if it kept his eyes on Seunghee, who is more than of legal age of consent where they live. 1 year and he's of international legal age.
Could we please stop with that "the age of consent in *insert Asian country* is a lot lower so it's okay" nonsense?
The age of consent is 13 in South Korea but that's only technically true because it's also not allowed to have sex with children and a child in that case is everyone who isn't an adult. Which means that blondie having sex with him would be illegal.
As for the rest, yes he was in middle school and there's nothing in this story that suggests that he's not preying on minors anymore and just happened to fall in love with one.
He still talks and behaves like a predator. He hasn't changed.
I see you're ignoring everything else i said. The reason i bring up the legal age of consent is to point out cultural differences, it seems iffy to Americans, but maybe not so much over there. So, it actually still hasn't been confirmed if he's preying on Seunghee, it just confirmed what we all knew, that he was a creep in the past. You're saying he hasn't changed, but we don't know yet. If he hasn't, good riddance. Anyways, do you remember how you were at 17? I remember how i was and i would've loved consensual sex with anyone i found attractive. I was 15 when i had sex (no penetration) with a 19 y. o., did i or do i now view that guy as a predator? No. I wanted it.
The age of consent in the USA can even be lower than 13 ( 12 if the partner is young enough). There are no cultural differences between (wealthy) Asian countries like South Korea or Japan in that regard. It's simply a myth usually brought up by people who are into shotacon and lolicon stuff because they feel the need to justify their kinks.
And I didn't ignore the rest you wrote. I answered your question and said that nothing in the story suggests that he has changed and that the last few chapters actually proved the opposite (his friend's reaction, his desperate behavior, the things he said and how he said it). There has been no change.
I'm pretty sure that at some point it will be explained why he's only into minors and it'll be emotional, we'll feel sorry for him and then he won't prey on them anymore but right now he's still the same old creep he was when he was first introduced.
You can decide to see it differently but that's how I see it.
Btw I lost my virginity when I was 13 because I was horny (I looked a lot older than 13) to a 19-year old guy who had feelings for me (I still feel guilty because it was just a ONS for me). I'm also not American. So it's not like I'm saying that teenagers under 18 can't have consensual sex.
But that doesn't make blondie any less of a creep or some of his actions less criminal.
Also, you say it'd be illegal, but i'm not so sure you're interpreting the laws right. The fact that there is a "legal age of consent" (15) AND a legal adult age (19) implies to me that sex is allowed IF it's consensual. While as raping someone under 19 there will charge you with raping a minor. Think arranged marriages, isn't it customary to consumate your relationship immediately after? You're telling me that's illegal? I don't think so.
Arranged marriages aren't really a thing in South Korea anymore. Maybe the parents arrange a date for their children but they still make their own decisions.
I had to look up the age to get married. It's 18 (I'm not sure if it's the Korean age or or not) when the parents allow it and 20 when they don't.
Again, please stop with the *in Asia...* myths. I'm not even Asian and even I'm already bothered by it.
Anyone flirting with kids can fucking catch these hands. Legal = /= right. Normal healthy adults dont try to have romantic relationships with kids. Idk how old you are but like, as an adult, I can barely see 18yos as adults and therefore seeking relationships with people younger than that is fucked because the dynamics are WRONG from the start. Why would someone want to date someone who is less mature (aka vulnerable) than them and cannot be part of their world or understand it? Because they need to have the upper hand.
Now ONLY SEEKING young boys??? G.R.O.S.S.
I mean I dont understand why its even up to debate. And idgaf if the kid is happy, it still makes the adult a bad person.
Age of consent laws that have ages lower than 18 are meant to cover minors who have sexual relations with each other. Not sexual relations between adults and minors. And in the case of Japan at least, the commonly cited age of 13 is only the minimum age that prefectures can set their age of consent to. In practice, 18 is still the age of consent. Asia is not your pedophile's legal haven. Even if the laws feature ages as low as 13 there are still people in those countries who find relationships between adults and minors morally repulsive. There are people who are vocally against the sexualization of schoolchildren over there. Don't project your pedophile apologia on them.
Whether or not Blondie is in love with Seunghee hasn't been clarified yet, this latest chapter actually leans towards that he is rather than the opposite. That's literally what the story is about right now, whether or not Blondie has feelings. You both keep asserting that "he's NOT in love" like it's a fact, but it's not. The story has been told 50/50. If you believe the president, then he's a predator, if you believe what we ourselves have seen then it's not so clear. He started out creepy TO throw us off, then it fleshed him out and gave us bonding moments between him and Seunghee and Seungtaek/Kyubin showing he's not always after every minor. I want you two to remember that Blondie has had opportunities that he gave up. Remember when Seunghee was in the car with him asking about spending time with him and he told him he needs to make friends? He also said in his head that he wont let Seunghee end up like him, so you know that's not a lie as he said it to himself in his head. If he has feelings and Seunghee is of legal age, no problem. If it ends up that he's just preying on Seunghee, then he deserves whatever happens to him. You want to make an argument of power, well it doesn't matter that the adult has more power if the younger one isn't being preyed on. I've said this already, but no one here would have a problem with BlondieXSeunghee if the story portrayed their relationship as pure and loving, it's only an issue if he's preying on Seunghee. Which is what we're about to find out. I'd also like you two to keep in mind that your opinions are based in your own reality, you sound like you have American views on consent. For Koreans, the age of consent is 15, he 2 years older. Peoples' perceptions on this change regionally, especially in Asia. In situations like this, what matters is their feelings. I had sex (without penetration) with a 19 y. o. at 15, did or do i view them as a predator? No, because i chose to. I wanted it. We already know he has preyed on minors, though apparently not slept with them, now we're going to see if he finally fell for someone who, frankly, is old enough where they live. If he is, maybe it's good that he fell for someone of legal age that will occupy his attention, he can enter into a healthy relationship. To be clear, i know who Seunghee ends up with, but none of us know WHY yet. Maybe Blondie takes one for the team and steers Seunghee towards a relationship with someone closer in age? Who knows?
Wait, Seunghee is 18 y.o.? Then what's the problem? He's a legal adult. He's not practicing pedophilia on Seunghee at that point. At most you could say the age gap is distateful and that's personal preference. It's weird that he goes after them while they're still in high school, his motivations there definitely make him a pedophile (not literally, i know pedophilia refers to children age 13 and below, i just don't know what else to call his tastes), but the reason people want Seunghee away from him is because they feel like Seunghee is another victim. He's an adult. Right now we need to see how the blond really feels about Seunghee, this chapter implied he actually cares. If he actually cares and Seunghee is 18 y.o., why does it matter anymore? I know who Seunghee ends up with, but maybe, if the feelings are genuine, Seunghee could've been the one to lure him away from kids? I guess the argument would be Seunghee's mental age. Strange that the blond finally finds a legal adult he's into and the president tries to make him feel gross, i think i see jealousy. If he really thinks that blondie is trash, why is he not in bars? Feelings.
koreans count a newborn baby as one year old so seunghee's international age is most likely 17 (or 16 assuming he hasn't reached his bday). and the legal age for koreans is 19 as well. like you said if seunghee is of age internationally it would've been a non-issue but that's not the case here unfortunately.
Honestly, it’s pretty interesting how these stories insight ppl to actually do research on the laws and that (myself included)
But I can’t help but think of those who have parents or someone that looks over their search history....
Once I was discussing with someone about the legality of insest regarding blood relation or not. They couldn’t look it up coz they were on their brother’s computer and I couldn’t help but think that that would be an awkward conversation to have
People seem to be forgetting that this Sihoo and Myunghan's Sihoo aren't the same person. Myunghan's Sihoo was very supportive, despite wanting Myunghan to himself, this makes everyone immediately feel like new Sihoo is a good match for Myunghan automatically, but this Sihoo has been absent all of Myunghan's life and is now in this weird rivalry with Seungchan. I'm wondering if maybe this new three way relationship is more about Seungchan than it is about Myunghan. Think about it, why would Sihoo suddenly start competing with Seungchan? We want to say love for Myunghan, but he has no reason to love Myunghan as they're basically still strangers and i believe it mentioned that Seungchan was in the way back when they were kids. Couldn't it be that Sihoo's motivations are actually hatred/irritation towards Seungchan, hence him sticking to Myunghan? I wonder... ( ̄へ ̄)








This is damn hot, hopefully some mpreg in the future! Looking forward to more. ⁄(⁄ ⁄·⁄ω⁄·⁄ ⁄)⁄
It'd be interesting to see his gruff personality, but as a father.