Maybe he plans to play it off? I mean, since everything just now was planned as well? Or he might just kill him and drag him to the basement, guess we'll see? I mean, he literally gave Kwak the evidence, maybe it's fake? Or maybe he wanted to kill someone to let off the pressure? I wonder how he'd play off the blood?
Pretty sure he wanted to test him to see if Kwak was suspecting him of murder. And I think the nail is real since we know Dangwoo keeps the clothing of peoplehes killed, so why not accessories? If Kwak hadn’t taken the nail and hadn’t lied about taking it, Sangwoo might have let him go, hence why he covered his injuries. But since he know knows he’s now being suspected by someone higher up, he’s gotta decide what to do. If he lets Kwak go, Sangwoo will remain a suspect. If he kills him, he’ll buy himself some time but will also make the other officer even more eager to catch him. And since Sangwoo is prett unhinged right now, I think he will kill Kwak. But like you said, we’ll see.
Hopefully he meant that he wants to marry Ume, i dont remember him specifying a person, Ume just kinda started going off about his girlfriend. What Ume should've done is make him jealous.
I see the speech bubble and acknowledge that it can easily be interpreted that way, but wasn't he just answering Ume as he was struggling with her name? Maybe Ume has to continue fighting for him though... it sounded like he was saying "yes, thats my current girlfriend, but you're getting her name wrong". Like hes answering that that is his girlfriend rather than that she's who he wants to marry. It showed that a running gag between them is that Ume doesn't know his girlfriends' names.
The secret ending is the real ending. "open ended", then why does one perfectly flow into and precede the other? How is anyone supposed to just... Ignore the next chapter so that the "final chapter" is the true ending? The true ending is that he died and his consciousness went back to his younger body where they both relived their lives hapilly ever after. Period. "ignore the part where he comes back and his death could be an ending". What?
All definitions of pedophilia specify "prepubescent children". Prepubescent refers to children who have yet to reach puberty. The age range specified varies, but the age range generally used is 13- as puberty, generally speaking, hasn't started till then. In other words, the age range is the definitive detail in diagnosis. If the person is attracted to prepubescent children, it's pedophilia, period. No other factors matter. Not whether the person is romantically attracted to the children, nothing. Just that they are targeting prepubescent children. Doesn't matter if they can sleep with adults, they also WANT to prey on children. NOTHING. ELSE. MATTERS. A pedophile is SPECIFICALLY someone preying on prepubescent children.
Awwi notably left out the age range and the wording "prepubescent children" because they want to believe that they're right in calling anything creepy pedophilia. That last topic was a sad attempt at picking apart the definition with philosophy, even leaving parts out, to make themselves right.
The reason i, and others, are specifying what pedophilia is is because it's annoying when people throw around heavy words incorrectly. He is a "predator", not a "pedophile". All pedophiles are predators, not all predators are pedophiles. It annoys me in the same way it annoys me when people try to say that everything is rape. Rape and pedophilia are two horrible, but SPECIFIC things that don't need watered down by people just... Including things in them. Preying on children age 13- is worse than propositioning young adults with brains developed enough to reject you. Both are bad, one is worse. Grabbing a boob isn't rape, forced penetration is rape. Can you see how false comparisons might be annoying and insensitive? Do you find it appropriate for a woman who'd had her boob grabbed to compare her experience to a rape victim held down and brutally penetrated against their will? Do you find it appropriate to compare a man flirting with teenagers to a pedophile leading an unknowing child into some bushes? If so, the problem lies in your thinking.
Fair’s fair with this. The “predator” and “pedophilel” thing is an interesting outline btw, never thought of it like that.
People overuse and misuse words a lot. Had a co-worker in his 40s who was dating a 20 year old and a lot of the other workers called him a pedophile (not to his face, coz they were old nags who were all nice around him and then stabbed him in the back). I got the shits with them for the incorrect accusation and how unfair they were treating him. (That and I was the same age as this girl at the time and felt insulted a bunch of old nags didn’t consider 20 year olds capable of making up their own minds) Will admit, back then I considered pedophile was a adult preying on anyone under the age of consent (my country that’s 16) Older and wiser now.... well older and not as stupid anyway.
There was a really bad transition where suddenly they're all in college now. The Sihoo Myunghan had been seeing was an illusion from his trauma of watching real Sihoo fall from a balcony when they were kids. Hyung (Seungchan) is a childhood friend Myunghan made after Sihoo's mom stopped letting Sihoo come over because she blamed Myunghan's mom for the balcony accident. Time had passed with the 3 of them not talking to each other while Myunghan was imagining Sihoo with him all the time. By the time Myunghan and Hyung meet again it's high school senior year, that's why it seems like they barely know each other again. Flash forward, Hyung confronts Myunghan about his hallucinations and then takes him to meet the real Sihoo, now grown up. It looks like this is going to be the end of the story and in this scene it doesn't really look like Sihoo is at all interested in Myunghan other than to say hi as they used to know one another, but then it looks like the author decided to continue the story into college as, next thing we know, they're randomly all buddy buddy with Seungchan and Sihoo seemingly not liking each other. The implication is that they have a rivalry for Myunghan. Though there was no buildup, we're just thrown into it. And here we are.
I replied to your reasons under the other topic, if you haven't seen yet. TLDR: There isn't anything implying that Sihoo's mother told Sihoo that Myunghan's mother came over begging. They haven't seen each other since childhood, it was senior year of high school, it makes sense that Sihoo wouldn't be invested in Myunghan as they're essentially strangers by then. Think back to your own dropped friends.









This just showed that Sangwoo's father was trying at least ever since Sangwoo was born to keep their family together. And that Sangwoo's mom was crazy since back then. I'm sure there'll be theories that it was PPD, idts though, since she never got better. He was good to her for YEARS, judging by how far back it's shown us she was crazy. Think about it, Sangwoo was at least 4 when she tried to smother him. He was still trying to reign her in in that flashback...