svbhv's Topics (38)

there is so much of this story that just did not make sense to me. 1) why they fell in love or what they fell in love with because they seem to have just clung onto each other for survival like what did zachary love if not pussy (since she was fifteen no less,,, kill him!! i need him hung and quartered, i need him gunned down in the streets like a ceo) and what did she love if not the future in which he existed thus she did not suffer (as much)? what annoyed me about the tone of the epilogue was the narrator acting as though this somehow became a marriage of love when it is still very much a marriage of convenience. this is just two people, abandoned by their family, trauma bonding and for some reason we’re calling romance. lets be so serious. 2) the antagonist was the second prince but how is her father not the ultimate villain in all this? if he was just remotely fucking for real he would have thought, being a man of paper as they so claimed, damn i should write to my daughter, that my wife died to have, which i sold like livestock, because surely her coming home to see people who dont fucking hate her guts would not for some reason nullify a marriage?? is that not basic math or simple logic or common fucking sense oh my gods. i need this man to be thrown at the sun i dont want a molecule of him to remain. the fact that her father didn’t even know she was upset with him to me displays the depth with which he did not even consider her to be a person because even if the subject in question were a dog and not a child i still would have visited something known and precious to me for eleven years. if he had empathised with her grief and anger for a single moment, im convinced that he would have drowned. 3) is more general but i have always questioned the cishetero patriarchy not on a ‘moral’ basis at first but more on a logical one because how does it make sense that women cant inherit titles when the children comes out of them? “you can never trust that the child belongs to the man because you never know where the woman have been” men claim to scorn a woman’s sexual history but you leave the title to them when they fuck anything thats remotely warm? you dont need a paternity if you can hear the screams of labour through the door babe. this is my problem with the patriarchy, its fucking stupid. yall sound like the dumbest person to have ever crawled to earth.

ceasar slitting his throat because leewon tried to break up with his is a) classic manipulative tactic of an abusive relationship but also b) he should have let him lmaoo. pick up the gun babe ill even cock it for you say ahhh

gabriel is so annoying to be honest. he is the definition of those uwu im just a babygworl people when in actuality he is merely a man incapable of acknowledging his capacity for evil because he has this whole holy knight of the holy empire rotten chip on his righteous fucking shoulders that makes him habitually situate himself in a position of innocence so that he can never see himself guilty. the level of delusion required for his character to function disgusts me. more than that, the way gabriel is interested in ariadne is so jail like why are you a nineteen year old looking at a fourteen year old like that when even her husband who is much closer to her did not register any sexual interest until he saw her as a fully grown twenty year old?? brother eughhh

“in the end the origin of species is love” hits so hard

how is 165cm midget size are we joking

harace’s character is so anthropocentric he sounds stupid. i do think that members of a specific species can often realise the scope of that species failings a lot more jarringly than members outside of that species. thus while i can see that vampires seemingly treated other species like cattle would explain why harace who has been socialised into human society would see such inhumane behaviour to be monstrous, i can’t see how he would generalise that monstrosity into a representation of his whole species (without systemic indoctrination) and i certainly can’t see how heilo indiscriminately killing vampires just because his family was killed by one vampire is somehow a proportionate response and not genocidal behaviour. that’s like saying my family was murdered by clowns so i have to personally assassinate all clowns because they are all capable of annihilating families. its so fucking unserious. literally giving the critical thinking skill of a seven year old. the author who built these characters need to first build themselves.

between the father brother teacher lover friend bomb and the cliffhanger. im choosing to hyperfixate on the cliffhanger instead. its so ridiculous when they put a white rag over a character’s mouth to knock them out because chloroform is not going to make a grown man drop from a single whiff. they are much more likely to die from suffocation in the time it takes for chloroform to affect consciousness. thus people used chloroform in this manner to kill people not kidnap them. could have just hit him in the head with a baseball bat. much more accurate and would have taken the same amount of panels in a chapterヾ(╹◡╹)ﾉ~

whenever i see shit like this, i am reminded of my best friend’s motto: i don’t believe in the prison industrial complex but i do believe in murder. because why drag this out when the plot is thinner than the hair of an unloved white man. put us both out of our misery and pick up the gun babygworl

how is this, i mean lee and han becoming romantic or whatever ┑(￣Д ￣)┍, even supposed to happen exactly? because from where im standing han is no different to lee’s highschool rapists. how can the author even defend him after something like this to justify some resemblance of a happy ending? i mean, im sure we have all read worse, but you cannot possibly tell me that han didn’t know how inexperienced lee was when they didn’t even establish a safe word, the foundation of any bdsm play, let alone an ongoing arrangement, until like the third session?? what also doesn’t make sense to me is why han is even doing pain play at all when no matter how experienced he may seem to lee, who knows nothing, to me hes clearly just making shit up. there is barely any after care, no discussion of protection, whoever uses nipple clamps like han does needs to be bashed in the head with a baseball bat. people get their nipples ripped off that way what is this is man doing? also i saw someone use noncon to describe whats happening here, which is a lot more than most of yall were willing to admit, but its still wrong. noncon starts with consent and this is blackmail, lunches and dinners and sleeping in his bed is not going to change the fact that this is blackmail. the basis of consent is informed and reversible and nothing lee has ever heard of. hes had no choice when his job was on the line and no family or friends to turn to. furthermore there is literally no reason for han to not have known that lee was uninformed about his preferences when he spends what seems the whole day staring at our abandoned in the rain dog of a main character. you’re telling me that this man probably knows the shape of every pore on lee’s face but not see that something was wrong when he was having flashbacks (the ptsd kind not the recall kind) in a session? you’re telling me that a man who knows bdsm wouldn’t think to stop? so what can i assume of this exertion of pain if not malicious intent? how can anyone turn this around and say they didn’t know? does the harm of both triggering a past trauma and inflicting a present harm not matter, if han for some reason no logical nor sense could find, did not know?

i don’t understand what the collective upset over rein’s hot and cold act is about like yes its fucking annoying but her anxiety and distrust and resentment (the driver) was the product of will’s actions. he did that. what did he think would have been the consequence of his manipulation when despite having his memories will never made the effort to be honest. instead he went out of his way to portray himself as the “innocent lamb” that he never was. she literally told him her heart could not take it if he lied one more time and he fucking lied did he not? did he think the woman he has been obsessed with for two lifetimes (because he saw a fucking portrait in an abandoned warehouse - pure unhinged behaviour), someone he called his god his sun his world was a fickle woman who did not do as she said she would? did rein give that impression? wilhelm might have been helpless before but he certainly wasn’t when stole her revenge for himself (the sole purpose of which to reclaim the sense of autonomy lost when she was no longer the noblest lady in the land - the purpose she has been working towards her whole life) and he was not helpless when he backed her into corner despite her pleas to be let go and dont tell me that he was helpless when he raped her for three days. his first life was fucked up and not anything i would wish on my worst enemy but was hers somehow sunshine and roses? rotting away in a land she did not know clinging onto revenge she had no chance of succeeding falling into an inebriated stupor to beg a dead man for a miracle was better? i think i read about twenty consecutive comments saying something along the lines of rein lost her iq after michel died,,, you mean when she gave will a chance to come clean and he didn’t? you mean when rein was betrayed by yet another man? after the last time that happened which to everything that was dear to her was taken away over night? also i don’t understand the bashing ive seen over her being a bad mother to wilroy when theres been not one peep over wilhem being a shit fucking dad the man saw him twice in three years when she raised the boy for three years before handing him over (what was she going to do? say no to the emperor?) so yeah she has been no saint but to act like will loves her when it is his obsession that made her put that blade to her throat and slice because he is fucking radioactive waste is crazy. lets take deeper breaths and be a little more for real.