Somehow, the numbers keep changing.
First they would say : ill pay you 500 million if you do that.
Then somehow they speak as if it was 50 million
Then 1 billion becomes 100 millions
Again and again and again.
Also they said the private debt is 114 millions, but just now the MC spoke about a bank loan but we don’t even know how much. (Was it lost in the translation or just not mentionned by the author yet...idk)
Even the rich girl, she just offered 20 millions to the MC, and then somehow she says 200 millions.
Some comment talking as if Woohyun made a mistake that is normal.
Imagine your BF telling you : ok lets break up. I just found my ex from high school and we are getting back. Oh and sorry for cheating on you with her, couldn’t resist
Then what if he comes back ? You gonna say :
Oh well it was just his nostalgia, his feelings from the past confused him, ill forgive him.
Is that what you think? Because that’s the kind of vibes im getting from many comments.
MC is trash and not likeable. And if Seok il wants him back, well that’s his choice but i personally dislike that idea.
I 100% agree. The mc is too old he is acting like a child. Some things are timeless but other stuff is only fun and interesting because of who you were in the past. Both the mc and the other guy are trying to redo their past . That's not a relationship I hope woo going with the other guy. Deserve each other
Ok Chanwoo is a bit weird. If the sex with MD is so good/important to you, that you legit says *MD might not like that i have a BF* to your potential bf(implying that you care more about MD). That was the first thing you said to the guy you want to date, instead of asking him if he is okay that you are in an open relationship.
If your relationship with MD is that important, how come you aren’t even willing to try date him.... im confused.
Me : that psycho is like a kid, it’s almost cute
Also me : well he still a crazy fucker that pimps Hyungdo around and has violent. Anger issue
Also me : wtf man did you just throw his head on that cake???
Final form me : ok well idc if you die. But if author wants to give you a ship i might like it. You are a shit but you still saved Hyungdo.
But i still think he is just gonna die. He is probably gonna chase after Hyungdo if he is alive and our MCs are gonna need to get rid of that dude.
The fact that Hen thinks he is unworthy of shari g a shower with Alek.
And when Alek said *are you afraid me and Hen might see each other naked* as if it never happened before.
I’m still mad we didn’t get confirmatiom wether or not Hen and Alek’s foreplay scenes were just imagination or not.
Well since the begining, the 2 foreplay scenes between Alec and Hyun seems to be Hyun’s imagination. MANY things pointed in that direction.
For example, why would Hyun out of the blue, have sex with Ivan and then go to Alec(with still the sperm inside). Also the fact Alec was still waiting for Hyun to visit his hotel room(even though they had one foreplay scene after Alec invited him).
Also Ivan said : we haven’t had time together since the xx island(at Hyun’s parents). And we did see them having sex after the xx island and before Ivan said that. But the sex scene we saw (right before Alek x Hyun’s 2nd foreplay) was probably part of the imagination
And other stuff that implied Hyun never went further than handjob with Alek.(like here)
Also Alek mentionned that Hyun will imagine having sex with the snake tribe due to his mark when he smell their scent (or something close to that)
BUUUUUT Hyun told his friend he was sleeping with 2 men. Alec said Hyun had more than one partner. And Hyun also had a bubble thought : we aren’t sleeping together or anything so what are we ? (Implying they had something before)
It’s very confusing. I do believe it never happened and the misunderstanding is caused by a wrong translation. But i can’t be 100% sure and the author should make it clear.











I mean.... if the author wanted us to empathize with Chang (just a little bit, by making him more human, you know). Shouldn’t she atleast make him regret the rape right after it happened?
Instead he
- Mock McQueen by talking about having sex with ed(rape) IN FRONT of Ed. (Thats like stabbing a victim right after the rape)
- Keeps stalking Ed after it happened
- Tries to make only himself feel better
He doesn’t even feel regret about the rape because thats the kind of person he is, he always treated Ed like shit from the very beginning and he didn’t change at all.
And if he eventually regrets what he did, it won’t be because of hurting Ed, but most likely he will regret because his actions led to losing Ed.
And it’s pretty fucked up to justify all the trash he is done by saying : he loved Ed so much.
That *love* is just as good as the love of a husband that beats up his wife every days.
The backstory didn’t even justify any of his actions. The author should have made him become crazy due to xxx events, that would have made more sense.
I don't think we can justify rape anyway ? Like, he can have the saddest backstory ever a rape is still a rape ? Anyway I agree with everything that you said and I don't think that the author tried to make us like Chang but just tried to show us how he came to love Ed and why he acted this way all this time ? (Sorry for my poor english)
I don’t think rape can be justified, but the author tried to somehow justify it by showing how Chang had come to take that path.
First of all, i think it’s pretty stupid to actually try to justify it (well i think it’s different if the rapist has turned crazy and we get a backstory to know how he became a crazy person). But even there, i think the attempt was horrible, that’s what i meant.
The backstory was a way to explain that Chang always loved Ed and that everything he has done towards Ed, he did it BECAUSE of his love.
And YET, everything he did was for his own happiness and he never took Ed’s feeling in consideration while destroying Ed’s life.
So a rape was thrown in this story, and the reason given is love, and yet the rapist never acted as a person that loves the victim.
That’s what i meant.
I think that giving a backstory to a character doesn't mean trying to justify is actions but I get you, guess we just disagree on some points (even if I agree on the most of it) and it's fine
The author explained Chang’s story, and about his feelings for Ed. That itself means the author was trying to make us understand Chang point of view. And that means justifying his actions. But i’m not saying that the author is trying to make us think it’s okay.
More like she wants us to understand him. And doing that is trying to make him less of a bad guy.
(But Chang’s actions were absurd to me so it was pretty pointless to give him a backstory)
For example : if a man killed my mother. I would feel hate that person to an insane level. But if i was told that his intentions were initially not bad, for example, his life was shit and he became alcoholic and then started drugs and doesn’t even know he it came to killing my mom. I would still hate him, but knowing that he isn’t pure evil, that he didn’t wish for that (even though it’s technically his choice to drink and take drugs). If i can understand his life path, it make it look like he ain’t as bad as i thought.
If you still disagree, i respect that. I could be wrong but it makes sense to me.