Whats the definition of a doujinshi? I used to think it’s just a not canon manga xD but am i wrong?
From what I understand, doujinshi are self-published works. this means that doujinshis can be written by anybody (the original author, fans, others artists, etc) that are about the characters & story of the work. djs are usually canon when written by the original author--but there are time when original author doesn't make it canon but just play around with their characters bc they think its interesting. on the other hand, anything made by other creators relating to the work is not canon. so the answer to your last question is YES. It's possible for original author to publish their work w/o a company and tat is what a dj is.
For this doujinshi, it was made from the same mangaka of the main story and it is canon. instead of publishing with the original story, this dj was published separately.
I have a question concerning the prequel:
When Rogi forced Tatsuyuki to have sex with him. Technically, It wasn’t rape, it was more like Tatsuyuki selling his body(because he owed money to Rogi and didn’t want to be a burden for his dad). But then right after Nozomi took Tatsuyuki out of Rogi’s house, they were pretty much acting as if Tatsuyuki was kidnapped. Did i miss something?(i’m so confused)
Blackmailing someone to have sex with you is generally not a nice thing to do! Legally, it's called "Coercion", and in some states it's a rape case (it should be one everywhere, but such is the world we live in). Coercion by itself is illegal too! IDK about the laws in Japan though, not that anyone in this manga's gonna use the legal system for anything!
Are you aware of what rape is? He *didn't* give him a choice. It wasn't consent, it wasn't a choice. He was blackmailed and therefore in that regard forced to sell his body. That's not consent and it's not in the least legal. That is rape.
If you're telling someone you will kill their family or in other ways hurt their loved ones if they don't pay with their body, is that not rape, if the person agrees? Someone threatening and you agreeing to avoid said threat from actually happening is not consent.
So Rogi is in fact still a rapist scumbag - and he knows.










i wonder why Charlie just don’t go away? Maybe he has no money/home but that would mean that he is doing this job with consent, even if it was introduced by the seme, we don’t know if he really did something bad. And if the seme is forcing Charlie to stay, then there was no need to pretend love at this point. I hope this will be explained because manga loves to put lots of shit but explain 1/3 of it
If he has no money or home he's NOT consenting. Nice victim blaming though. This is the same reason why only 1/3 of everything gets explained btw. Reasons are irrelevant. Authors know that because there will always be people such as yourself willing to victim blame even without them. Ktbn.
is this worth reading?
i mean the manhwa
im curious who is "he" in line if he did something bad T.T
I ain’t victim blaming dude, if Charlie has no ressources it means that he is doing this to survive aka no one is forcing him to do it. How is that even victim blaming?
I like the story so far but I’d suggest you to wait until it’s finished to read it
btw, regarding the victim blaming issue, just to raise a point, actually in my country, we have this republic act regarding anti-hazing law due to the raising cases of dead student trying to join fraternitiies but ending up dead because of the severe hazing/rite process. It is said in the act that even if the applicant (person trying to join) signed a waiver or letter of consent for the process, that letter remains invalid, and if the applicant want to sue the people who did the hazing, then the applicant can. same with psychological trauma etc caused during the whole application process for the frat or organizations. even if for the majority, the activities or process wasnt hard or traumatizing enough, once the applicant, even if solely, felt traumatized or humilated, that applicant can file for case. bottomline, no one else can say whether a person consented, traumatized, or humilated but the person who thinks so. not even the majority.
In this case, Charlie sure said that he was used by making him fall in love, but it wasnt clearly stated yet whether he was being forced to stay or do whatever or if he's doing it willingly albeit the mistreatment and being whored out.
Well that’s the thing, he did say he was used but right now, he knows that and he is staying. I doubt there is a contract that force him to stay (but maybe) and i doubt he is forced to stay illegaly(because then there was no need to fake love). And so here comes the point of my post, why is he staying, does he have no money or maybe he still loves the seme and is staying despite being used.
i got your point so i raised that comment for the first reply. sorry, i didn't comment on the reply